18.12.2012 Views

Myeloid Leukemia

Myeloid Leukemia

Myeloid Leukemia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 Mokany et al.<br />

4. Thermocycle the reactions and export the data (Subheading 3.4., steps 8–10).<br />

Repeat steps 1–4 twice to total three experiments with exactly the same reactions.<br />

Use the same aliquot of calibrators and controls for all three experiments.<br />

5. For the five replicates of each control within each experiment, calculate the following:<br />

Average normalized copy #<br />

SD normalized copy #<br />

CV normalized copy # (%) = 100 × SD normalized copy # / average normalized copy #<br />

6. Calculate the following ratios for the high control:<br />

Experiment #1 Average normalized copy #/Experiment #2 Average normalized copy #<br />

Experiment #1 Average normalized copy #/Experiment #3 Average normalized copy #<br />

Experiment #2 Average normalized copy #/Experiment #3 Average normalized copy #<br />

7. Repeat step 6 for the medium and low controls<br />

8. Perform t-tests between the following values:<br />

Replicates of high control normalized copy #: Experiment #1 vs Experiment #2<br />

Replicates of high control normalized copy#: Experiment #1 vs Experiment #3<br />

Replicates of High Control normalized copy#: Experiment #2 vs Experiment #3<br />

9. Repeat step 8 for the medium and low controls.<br />

10. If the difference in Average normalized copy # for a control from different experiments<br />

does not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05) then there is no real difference<br />

between the Average normalized copy# generated by the two experiments, and the ratio<br />

is irrelevant. Statistically significant differences may not necessarily be significant<br />

in the context of the assay. Real-time quantitative PCR assays have a<br />

maximum sensitivity of twofold, and thus any ratio between experiments that<br />

falls between 0.5 and 2 is generally acceptable. In our hands, the ratio between<br />

experiments for the high and medium controls fall between 0.67 and 1.5 (a variation<br />

of 50%). The low control shows greater variability, and we measure ratios of<br />

between 0.56 and 1.8 (an 80% variation) (see Note 21).<br />

11. Intra-assay variation is determined from the CV normalized copy # for each control. In<br />

our experience, the CV normalized copy # for the high and medium controls should fall<br />

below 25%, and that for the low control below 35%.<br />

4. Notes<br />

1. Most patients harbor either the L- or S-type, whereas approx 10% of patients<br />

harbor the V-type. In V-type patients, the breakpoint usually occurs within exon

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!