06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

65 Numbers as Summoners<br />

See 521c-526c. How can the rational part of the soul be awakened and made <strong>to</strong><br />

turn <strong>to</strong>ward the forms? Socrates notes that there are certain objects of sense<br />

perception – “summoners,” he calls them – that “strike the relevant sense at the<br />

same time as do their opposites.” For instance, the same thing can appear both big<br />

and small, hard and soft, thick and thin, light and heavy, and so on. Each of these<br />

properties is, of course, relational. For something <strong>to</strong> appear both big and small, it<br />

has <strong>to</strong> appear big in relation <strong>to</strong> one thing, and small in relation <strong>to</strong> something else.<br />

Socrates’ point is that the question “Is it big?” leads the mind <strong>to</strong> a further question<br />

– “What is it <strong>to</strong> be big?” – and this question cannot be answered simply on the<br />

basis of sense perception. One has <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p looking and start thinking. Socrates<br />

suggests that the numerical properties of things are similarly problematic and<br />

thought-provoking. His discussion of this is unclear, but he seems <strong>to</strong> have in mind<br />

questions such as these: Is a baseball team one or nine? Is a slice of pie one or<br />

one eighth? When one lump of clay is rolled in with another is the result one or<br />

two? <strong>The</strong>se questions, of course, have answers. But again, the answers call for<br />

more than mere sense perception. <strong>The</strong> rational part of the soul needs <strong>to</strong> wake up<br />

and consider what it means <strong>to</strong> be one, nine, one eighth, and so on, and then<br />

consider how these numbers “that are accessible only in thought” are relevant in<br />

particular contexts. Numbers are some of the simplest and most accessible of<br />

forms, and people who make a regular exercise of studying them “become<br />

generally sharper than they were.” It therefore makes sense <strong>to</strong> begin the study of<br />

forms with the study of numbers.<br />

How are mathematical truths (such as that the three interior angles of a<br />

triangle are equivalent <strong>to</strong> two right angles) similar in nature <strong>to</strong> definitional<br />

truths (such as that green is a color)?<br />

How are mathematical truths different in nature from observational truths<br />

(such as that there is beer in the refrigera<strong>to</strong>r)?<br />

Are mathematical questions better at turning the mind <strong>to</strong>ward forms than<br />

other sorts of questions?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!