06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

73 <strong>The</strong> Timocratic City<br />

See 547b-548d. When the various people in the city start disagreeing with one<br />

another, those who are especially strong in the appetitive part of the soul (“iron<br />

and bronze”) pull the city <strong>to</strong>wards economic development and the pursuit of<br />

wealth while those especially strong in the rational and spirited parts (“the gold<br />

and silver types”) pull the city “<strong>to</strong>wards virtue and the old political system.”<br />

Socrates speculates that the city ends up compromising, with the former auxiliaries<br />

taking over as rulers. This is a compromise because the spirited values of honor<br />

and vic<strong>to</strong>ry, involving as they do earning the respect of other people, fall between<br />

the narrowly self-centered consumer values of the appetitive part and the rational<br />

part’s fully informed love of the good. After owning no private property at all in<br />

the aris<strong>to</strong>cratic city, the former auxiliaries take possession of all the land and<br />

houses, and distribute them in the manner of feudal lords. <strong>The</strong>n they enslave the<br />

city’s workers, “those whom they had previously guarded as free friends and<br />

providers of upkeep,” and turn their attention, in foreign affairs, <strong>to</strong> war, and in<br />

domestic affairs, <strong>to</strong> guarding against uprisings of the people. Socrates describes<br />

the domestic situation as enslavement because the workers are no longer working<br />

for the harmonious flourishing of the whole city. Instead, they are compelled <strong>to</strong> be<br />

part of the timocratic war machine. Although the rulers value above all else the<br />

hard-earned honors of warfare – “timocratic” means honor-ruled – this does not<br />

prevent them from indulging their appetitive desires in private; for as far as the<br />

spirited part is concerned, what goes on in private doesn’t matter much as long as<br />

it remains discreet and doesn’t surface <strong>to</strong> besmirch one’s reputation. What<br />

happens <strong>to</strong> the philosophers under this constitution is unclear. <strong>The</strong>y presumably<br />

desire <strong>to</strong> return <strong>to</strong> contemplation of the forms, but they have <strong>to</strong> find some way <strong>to</strong><br />

make a living, and the rulers are not going <strong>to</strong> pay them <strong>to</strong> undermine their<br />

reputations. (Maybe the philosophers end up researching new weapon systems.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> paradigmatic timocracy in Socrates’ day was Sparta, Athens’ primary<br />

adversary in the Peloponnesian War. Examples from later chapters in his<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

include Rome under the <strong>Republic</strong> with its profound concern for timocratic<br />

dignitas, and the feudal societies of Europe and Japan with their codes of honor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!