06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

important truth. In the present passage, he describes how enlightened craftsmen<br />

such as painters, weavers, and architects are <strong>to</strong> join the poets and musicians in<br />

creating for the guardians-in-training an ideally beautiful environment; “the<br />

influence exerted by those fine works” is <strong>to</strong> affect the senses “like a healthy<br />

breeze,” guiding them “from earliest childhood,” and without their being aware of<br />

the fact, “in<strong>to</strong> being similar <strong>to</strong>, friendly <strong>to</strong>ward, and concordant with the beauty of<br />

reason.” <strong>The</strong> idea is that a person can internalize “the beauty of reason” as a result<br />

of growing up in an environment pervaded by it. Having acquired the right tastes<br />

and distastes – a certain trained sensitivity <strong>to</strong> the presence or absence of beauty –<br />

while “he is still young, before he is able <strong>to</strong> grasp the reason . . . he will welcome<br />

the reason when it comes and recognize it easily because of its kinship with<br />

himself.” Socrates uses an analogy <strong>to</strong> hint at what he means here by being “able<br />

<strong>to</strong> grasp the reason.” Just as one doesn’t really know how <strong>to</strong> read until one knows<br />

the letters and how they can be combined <strong>to</strong> make words and phrases, one is not<br />

truly educated in music and poetry until one knows “the different forms of<br />

temperance, courage, generosity, high-mindedness, and all their kindred, and their<br />

opposites <strong>to</strong>o, which are carried around everywhere,” and can “see them in the<br />

things in which they are, both themselves and their images.” This is noteworthy as<br />

the first statement in the <strong>Republic</strong> of a distinction that will ultimately be crucial <strong>to</strong><br />

understanding Socrates’ reply <strong>to</strong> Glaucon’s challenge. We will have occasion<br />

later <strong>to</strong> consider it in greater detail, when it is set out more fully. For now, it is<br />

perhaps enough <strong>to</strong> see two things: first, that Socrates distinguishes between<br />

“forms” of things and “images” of things; and second, that Socrates thinks the<br />

knowledge of forms plays a role in the value judgments of a properly educated<br />

person similar <strong>to</strong> the role played in reading by a person’s knowledge of letters, i.e.,<br />

a fundamental role. But knowledge of the forms is for a later stage of education.<br />

At present, the guardians-in-training are <strong>to</strong> acquire an appreciation of beauty at the<br />

level, not of reasoning, but of feelings. <strong>The</strong>y are <strong>to</strong> be surrounded by beautiful<br />

things, and encouraged <strong>to</strong> love what is beautiful. Socrates describes and<br />

commends in this context a kind of interpersonal relationship that has at times<br />

been called “pla<strong>to</strong>nic love,” a drawing <strong>to</strong>gether in love of persons whose bodies<br />

and souls “share in the same pattern” of beauty. But it is a love that is not <strong>to</strong> suffer<br />

dis<strong>to</strong>rtion through the “excessive pleasure” of sexual intercourse. However

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!