06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

31 Doc<strong>to</strong>rs and Judges<br />

See 405a-410a. <strong>The</strong> goal of medicine, Socrates argues, is <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re sick or injured<br />

people <strong>to</strong> health and active living, not <strong>to</strong> prolong pointless, inactive living. Life<br />

does not benefit people who cannot do their work, nor does it benefit their cities,<br />

and so it is appropriate <strong>to</strong> let people die who are suffering from incurable,<br />

incapacitating diseases. Capital punishment is, for the same reason, an appropriate<br />

sentence for people who are incurably unjust. If one is morally unfit <strong>to</strong> do one’s<br />

work, then one has no proper place in the city. Socrates notices a certain basic<br />

similarity between doc<strong>to</strong>rs and judges. Doc<strong>to</strong>rs treat illness in the body; judges<br />

treat injustice in the soul. But while the best doc<strong>to</strong>rs “are not especially healthy by<br />

nature, and have themselves experienced the illnesses they treat,” the opposite is<br />

true of judges, the best of whom do not discover what injustice is like in youth,<br />

indulging in it themselves, but at a later time, “as an alien thing present in other<br />

people’s souls.” One might think that firsthand experience would benefit doc<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

and judges equally, but Socrates thinks that injustice is significantly different from<br />

illness in being an affliction of the soul that tends <strong>to</strong> pervert a person’s judgment,<br />

leaving them “stupid, distrustful at the wrong time, and ignorant of what a healthy<br />

character is.”<br />

When is it right <strong>to</strong> let a person die? This has never been a more pressing<br />

moral question than it is at present, physicians now having at their disposal<br />

antibiotics, intravenous feeding, radiologically-supported surgery, blood<br />

transfusions, organ transplants, respira<strong>to</strong>rs, blood pumps, dialysis machines,<br />

hormone treatments, and a host of other devices and procedures. Nowadays<br />

it is no longer even necessary for a human being <strong>to</strong> have a living brain <strong>to</strong> be<br />

maintained on life support.<br />

Socrates thinks that the only life worth supporting is a meaningful life, and<br />

the only meaningful life is a life of doing good work. So if one cannot do<br />

good work – work that makes good use of what one has <strong>to</strong> offer and benefits<br />

the city in some way – then one may as well die. Do you agree?<br />

Can a person be incurably evil? What would such a person be like?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!