06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

53 Philosophical Perspective and the Fear of Death<br />

See 486a-b. “And do you imagine that a thinker who is high-minded enough <strong>to</strong><br />

look at all time and all being will consider human life <strong>to</strong> be a very important<br />

thing?” asks Socrates. “He couldn’t possibly,” replies Glaucon. “<strong>The</strong>n he won’t<br />

consider death <strong>to</strong> be a terrible thing either, will he?” “Not in the least.” It is a<br />

little puzzling why Socrates supposes there is a connection between studying the<br />

forms and studying “all time and all being.” Particularly puzzling, perhaps, is the<br />

notion of studying “all time.” Forms may or may not be, strictly speaking,<br />

timeless (outside of time – a view that has been defended off and on in the his<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

of philosophy), but forms are clearly supposed by Socrates, here in the <strong>Republic</strong> as<br />

well as in other Pla<strong>to</strong>nic dialogues, <strong>to</strong> be unchanging. What it is <strong>to</strong> be beautiful,<br />

what it is <strong>to</strong> be green, what it is <strong>to</strong> be three in number, what it is <strong>to</strong> be a knife –<br />

these sorts of things remain, on this view, precisely and completely what they are,<br />

always. How then is study of the forms a study of “all time”? Perhaps the idea is<br />

that, when one knows the forms, one is equipped <strong>to</strong> recognize instances of the<br />

forms – the various particular things in time and space. Unlike some journalists<br />

who focus their concern specifically on political developments in the Middle East<br />

or his<strong>to</strong>rians who make the American Civil War their specialty, the philosopher,<br />

Socrates may be saying, studies the general characteristics of things, and in this<br />

way is able <strong>to</strong> contemplate and understand all particular instances of these general<br />

characteristics. (This of course is not <strong>to</strong> say that the same person cannot, in<br />

principle, be both journalist and philosopher, or his<strong>to</strong>rian and philosopher.) But<br />

what would it be like <strong>to</strong> have this sort of understanding, <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> grasp the<br />

essence of the nature of things? Socrates hints at part of an answer in the passage<br />

quoted above. A person given <strong>to</strong> such a perspective would be freed from the fear<br />

of death. Why? Because they would see beyond the transient details of human<br />

life <strong>to</strong> higher and greater things.<br />

Is it conceivable that there are greater things in reality than human beings?<br />

Is it possible, by coming <strong>to</strong> understand certain things, that one can<br />

transcend the perspective of humanity? Would achieving this be desirable?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!