06.09.2021 Views

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

75 <strong>The</strong> Oligarchic City<br />

See 550c-552e. Of the five types of cities and souls that Socrates is discussing,<br />

the oligarchic falls in the middle – two are more just (the aris<strong>to</strong>cratic and the<br />

timocratic) while two are more unjust (the democratic and the tyrannical). <strong>The</strong><br />

defining characteristic of the oligarchic city is that rich people rule. Because few<br />

are ever really rich in a community – wealth being the curiously relative concept<br />

that it is – it makes some sense <strong>to</strong> call such a government “oligarchy,” which<br />

means, literally, government by the few. Money is not, for Socrates, the root of all<br />

evil, but he does consider the love of it largely responsible for causing the<br />

timocratic city <strong>to</strong> devolve in<strong>to</strong> an oligarchic city. What begins in the timocratic<br />

city as a private amassing of wealth by the rulers eventually comes in<strong>to</strong> the open<br />

as shameless money-making, and then as highly respected money-making.<br />

Successful money-makers (business leaders) are praised, admired, and assigned so<br />

often <strong>to</strong> leadership positions that wealth ends up a requirement for serving as a<br />

ruler. Socrates identifies four problems with the oligarchic city: (1) people who<br />

are primarily money-makers have only a partial understanding of the city’s good,<br />

so their understanding of how <strong>to</strong> rule is incomplete, (2) the city “is not one, but<br />

inevitably two, a city of the poor and one of the rich, living in the same place and<br />

always plotting against one another,” (3) the rulers are not themselves soldiers,<br />

and so they are <strong>to</strong>rn between arming, and thereby empowering, the city’s poor, and<br />

hiring mercenaries, and (4) – in Socrates’ opinion the greatest of these problems –<br />

people are allowed <strong>to</strong> sell off all their possessions and go on living in the city.<br />

Such persons become “drones” (useless persons), either “stingless” drones<br />

(beggars) or drones “with stings” (criminals). For his<strong>to</strong>rical examples of oligarchic<br />

societies, consider the Netherlands in the heyday of the Dutch East India<br />

Company, or France before the democratic revolution of 1789.<br />

What are some examples of oligarchic societies in the world <strong>to</strong>day?<br />

Is it unjust for people in a city <strong>to</strong> be unemployed?<br />

Is it true that people who spend most of their time making money fail <strong>to</strong><br />

appreciate non-appetitive values such as honor and knowledge of the forms?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!