06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS<br />

Lemma 9.2.2 Let V and W be vector spaces and suppose {v 1 , ··· ,v n } is a basis for V.<br />

Then if L : V → W is given by Lv k = w k ∈ W and<br />

( n<br />

)<br />

∑<br />

n∑<br />

n∑<br />

L a k v k ≡ a k Lv k = a k w k<br />

k=1<br />

k=1<br />

then L is well defined and is in L (V,W) . Also, if L, M are two linear transformations such<br />

that Lv k = Mv k for all k, then M = L.<br />

Proof: L is well defined on V because, since {v 1 , ··· ,v n } is a basis, there is exactly one<br />

way to write a given vector of V as a linear combination. Next, observe that L is obviously<br />

linear from the definition. If L, M are equal on the basis, then if ∑ n<br />

k=1 a kv k is an arbitrary<br />

vector of V, ( n<br />

) (<br />

∑<br />

n∑<br />

n∑<br />

n<br />

)<br />

∑<br />

L a k v k = a k Lv k = a k Mv k = M a k v k<br />

k=1<br />

k=1<br />

and so L = M because they give the same result for every vector in V . <br />

The message is that when you define a linear transformation, it suffices to tell what it<br />

doestoabasis.<br />

Theorem 9.2.3 Let V and W be finite dimensional linear spaces of dimension n and m<br />

respectively Then dim (L (V,W)) = mn.<br />

Proof: Let two sets of bases be<br />

k=1<br />

k=1<br />

{v 1 , ··· ,v n } and {w 1 , ··· ,w m }<br />

for V and W respectively. Using Lemma 9.2.2, let w i v j ∈L(V,W) be the linear transformation<br />

defined on the basis, {v 1 , ··· ,v n }, by<br />

w i v k (v j ) ≡ w i δ jk<br />

where δ ik =1ifi = k and 0 if i ≠ k. I will show that L ∈L(V,W) is a linear combination<br />

of these special linear transformations called dyadics.<br />

Then let L ∈L(V,W). Since {w 1 , ··· ,w m } is a basis, there exist constants, d jk such<br />

that<br />

m∑<br />

Lv r = d jr w j<br />

Now consider the following sum of dyadics.<br />

Apply this to v r . This yields<br />

j=1 i=1<br />

m∑<br />

j=1 i=1<br />

j=1<br />

n∑<br />

d ji w j v i<br />

j=1 i=1<br />

k=1<br />

m∑ n∑<br />

m∑ n∑<br />

m∑<br />

d ji w j v i (v r )= d ji w j δ ir = d jr w i = Lv r<br />

Therefore, L = ∑ m ∑ n<br />

j=1 i=1 d jiw j v i showing the span of the dyadics is all of L (V,W) .<br />

Now consider whether these dyadics form a linearly independent set. Suppose<br />

∑<br />

d ik w i v k = 0.<br />

i,k<br />

j=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!