06.09.2021 Views

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

Linear Algebra, Theory And Applications, 2012a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

336 SELF ADJOINT OPERATORS<br />

Now argue U is unitary and use this to establish the result. To show this verify<br />

each row has length 1 and the inner product of two different rows gives 0. Now<br />

U kj = e −i 2π n jk and so (U ∗ ) kj<br />

= e i 2π n jk .<br />

18. Let f be a periodic function having period 2π. The Fourier series of f is an expression<br />

of the form<br />

∞∑<br />

n∑<br />

c k e ikx ≡ lim c k e ikx<br />

k=−∞<br />

n→∞<br />

k=−n<br />

and the idea is to find c k such that the above sequence converges in some way to f. If<br />

f (x) =<br />

∞∑<br />

k=−∞<br />

c k e ikx<br />

and you formally multiply both sides by e −imx and then integrate from 0 to 2π,<br />

interchanging the integral with the sum without any concern for whether this makes<br />

sense, show it is reasonable from this to expect<br />

c m = 1<br />

2π<br />

∫ 2π<br />

0<br />

f (x) e −imx dx.<br />

Now suppose you only know f (x) at equally spaced points 2πj/n for j =0, 1, ··· ,n.<br />

Consider the Riemann sum for this integral obtained from using the left endpoint of<br />

the subintervals determined from the partition { 2π<br />

n j} n<br />

. How does this compare with<br />

j=0<br />

the discrete Fourier transform? What happens as n →∞to this approximation?<br />

19. Suppose A is a real 3 × 3 orthogonal matrix (Recall this means AA T = A T A = I. )<br />

having determinant 1. Show it must have an eigenvalue equal to 1. Note this shows<br />

there exists a vector x ≠ 0 such that Ax = x. Hint: Show first or recall that any<br />

orthogonal matrix must preserve lengths. That is, |Ax| = |x| .<br />

20. Let A be a complex m × n matrix. Using the description of the Moore Penrose inverse<br />

in terms of the singular value decomposition, show that<br />

lim<br />

δ→0+ (A∗ A + δI) −1 A ∗ = A +<br />

where the convergence happens in the Frobenius norm. Also verify, using the singular<br />

value decomposition, that the inverse exists in the above formula.<br />

21. Show that A + =(A ∗ A) + A ∗ . Hint: You might use the description of A + in terms of<br />

the singular value decomposition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!