01.11.2021 Views

Timothy A. Philpot - Mechanics of materials _ an integrated learning system-John Wiley (2017)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

446

STATICALLy INdETERMINATE

bEAMS

M A

w

A x A

B

A y B y

A x

P

(a) Actual beam with loads

and reactions

M A

A y

A

w

(b) Released beam if B y is

chosen as the redundant

P

w

A x

A

B

A y

(c) Released beam if M A is

chosen as the redundant

FIGURE 11.1 Propped

cantilever beam.

P

B

vertical directions, respectively, and a restraint M A against rotation. The roller support prevents

translation in the vertical direction (B y ). Consequently, the propped cantilever has

four unknown reactions. Three equilibrium equations can be developed for the beam (ΣF x = 0,

ΣF y = 0, and ΣM = 0), but since there are more unknown reactions than there are equilibrium

equations, the propped cantilever is classified as statically indeterminate. The

number of reactions in excess of the number of equilibrium equations is termed the degree of

static indeterminacy. Thus, the propped cantilever is said to be statically indeterminate to

the first degree. The excess reactions are called redundant reactions or simply redundants

because they are not essential to maintaining the equilibrium of the beam.

The general approach used to solve statically indeterminate beams involves selecting

redundant reactions and developing an equation pertinent to each redundant on the basis of

the deformed configuration of the loaded beam. To develop these geometric equations, redundant

reactions are selected and removed from the beam. The beam that remains is called

the released beam. The released beam must be stable (i.e., capable of supporting the

loads) and statically determinate so that its reactions can be determined by equilibrium

considerations. The effect of the redundant reactions is addressed separately, through

knowledge about the deflections or rotations that must occur at the redundant support. For

instance, we can know with certainty that the beam deflection at B must be zero, since the

redundant support B y prevents movement either up or down at this location.

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the released beam must be stable and statically

determinate. For example, the roller reaction B y could be removed from the propped cantilever

beam (Figure 11.1b), leaving a cantilever beam that is still capable of supporting the applied

loads. In other words, the cantilever beam is stable. Alternatively, the moment reaction M A

could be removed from the propped cantilever (Figure 11.1c), leaving a simply supported

beam with a pin support at A and a roller support at B. This released beam is also stable.

A special case arises if all of the loads act transverse to the longitudinal axis of the beam.

The propped cantilever shown in Figure 11.2 is subjected to vertical (transverse) loads only. In

this case, the equilibrium equation ΣF x = A x = 0 is trivial, so the horizontal reaction at A vanishes,

leaving only three unknown reactions: A y , B y , and M A . Even so, this beam is still statically

indeterminate to the first degree, because only two equilibrium equations are available.

Another type of statically indeterminate beam is called a fixed-end beam or a fixedfixed

beam (Figure 11.3). The fixed connections at A and B each provide three reactions.

Since there are only three equilibrium equations, this beam is statically indeterminate to the

third degree. In the special case of transverse loads only (Figure 11.4), the fixed-end beam

has four nonzero reactions but only two available equilibrium equations. Therefore, the

fixed-end beam in Figure 11.4 is statically indeterminate to the second degree.

The beam shown in Figure 11.5a is called a continuous beam because it has more

than one span and the beam is uninterrupted over the interior support. If only transverse

loads act on the beam, it is statically indeterminate to the first degree. This beam could be

released in two ways. In Figure 11.5b, the interior roller support at B is removed so that the

released beam is simply supported at A and C, a stable configuration. In Figure 11.5c, the

exterior support at C is removed. This released beam is also simply supported; however, it

now has an overhang (from B to C). Nevertheless, the beam’s configuration is stable.

M A

w

P

M A

P

w

M B

M A

P1

P2

M B

A

A x

A y B y

B

A

A x

A y B y

B

B x

A

A x

A y B y

B

B x

FIGURE 11.2 Propped cantilever

subjected to transverse loads only.

FIGURE 11.3 Fixed-end beam with

load and reactions.

FIGURE 11.4 Fixed-end beam with

transverse loads only.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!