01.11.2021 Views

Timothy A. Philpot - Mechanics of materials _ an integrated learning system-John Wiley (2017)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

662

COMbINEd LOAdS

Similarly, Equation (15.4) can also be used to compute the Mises equivalent stress:

2

sM =

2

⎡⎣ ( sx − s y ) 2 + ( s y − sz ) 2 + ( sx − σz ) 2 + 6( τxy 2 + τyz 2 + τxz

2 ) ⎤ 1/2

⎦ (15.7)

For the case of plane stress, the Mises equivalent stress can be expressed from Equation

(15.5) as

2

σ = [ σ − σ σ + σ 2 ]

1/2

(15.8)

M p1

p1 p2 p2

or it can be found from Equation (15.4) by setting σ z = τ yz = τ xz = 0 to give

2 2 2 1/2

σ = [ σ − σσ + σ + 3 τ ]

(15.9)

M x x y y xy

To use the Mises equivalent stress, σ M is calculated for the state of stress acting at any

specific point in the component. The resulting value of σ M is then compared with the tensile

yield stress σ Y , and if σ M > σ Y , then the material is predicted to fail according to the maximumdistortion-energy

theory. The utility of the Mises equivalent stress has led to its widespread

use in tabulated stress analysis results and in the form of color-coded stress contour plots

common in finite element analysis results.

B

σ

− U

σ

σ

U

p2

Experimental data from tension test.

FIGURE 15.11 Failure

diagram for maximum-normalstress

theory for an element

subjected to plane stress.

If the naming convention for

principal stresses is followed

(i.e., σ p1 > σ p2 ), then all

combinations of σ p1 and σ p2 will

plot to the right of or below line

AB shown in Figure 15.11.

σ

− U

σ

U

A

σ

p1

Brittle materials

Unlike ductile materials, brittle materials tend to fail suddenly by fracture, with little evidence

of yielding; therefore, the limiting stress appropriate for brittle materials is the fracture

stress (or the ultimate strength) rather than the yield strength. Furthermore, the tensile

strength of a brittle material is often different from its compressive strength.

maximum-Normal-Stress Theory. 6 The maximum-normal-stress theory predicts

that failure will occur in a specimen that is subjected to any combination of loads when the

maximum normal stress at any point in the specimen reaches the axial failure stress determined

from an axial tension or compression test of the same material.

The maximum-normal-stress theory is presented graphically in Figure 15.11 for an

element subjected to biaxial principal stresses in the p1 and p2 directions. The limiting

stress σ U is the failure stress for the material the element is made of when it is loaded

axially. According to this theory, any combination of biaxial principal stresses σ p1 and σ p2

represented by a point inside the square of Figure 15.11 is safe whereas any combination

of stresses represented by a point outside of the square will cause failure of the element.

mohr’s Failure criterion. For many brittle materials, the ultimate tension and compression

strengths are different, and in such cases, the maximum-normal-stress theory should

not be used. An alternative failure theory, proposed by the German engineer Otto Mohr, 7 is

called Mohr’s failure criterion. To use this criterion, a uniaxial tension test and a uniaxial

compression test are performed to establish the ultimate tensile strength σ UT and ultimate

6

Often called Rankine’s theory after W. J. M. Rankine (1820–1872), an eminent engineering educator at Glasgow

University in Scotland.

7

The same Otto Mohr of Mohr circle fame.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!