01.11.2021 Views

Timothy A. Philpot - Mechanics of materials _ an integrated learning system-John Wiley (2017)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 2—Cantilever Beam with Concentrated load

The tie rod provides the reaction force at B for the cantilever

beam. Consider the cantilever beam subjected to this upward reaction

force B y . From Appendix C, the maximum beam deflection

(which occurs at B) due to a concentrated load applied at the tip

of the cantilever is given by

v

max

PL (

= v = − = − − By)

L BL y

B

=

3EI

3EI

3EI

3 3 3

Compatibility Equation

The expressions developed for v B from the two cases [Equations

(a) and (b)] are combined in a compatibility equation:

(b)

v

(1)

9 m

v

B

4 3

wL BL y

=− + ≠ 0

8EI

3EI

(c)

A

x

B

v B

In this instance, however, the beam deflection at B will not equal

zero, as it would if there were a roller support at B. The beam is

supported at B by an axial member that will stretch; consequently,

we must determine how much the rod will stretch in this situation.

Consider a free-body diagram of the aluminum tie rod. In

general, the elongation produced in rod (1) is given by

6 m

B y

δ

1

1 1

= FL

AE

The tie rod exerts an upward force B y on the cantilever beam. In

turn, the beam exerts a force of equal magnitude, but opposite in

direction, on the tie rod. Therefore, the deformation of rod (1) can

be stated in terms of the unknown reaction force B y as

δ

1

1 1

= BL y

AE

As rod (1) elongates because of the force it carries, the lower end

of the rod deflects downward. Since the beam is supported by the

rod, the beam also deflects downward at this point. The compatibility

equation [Equation (c)] must therefore be adjusted to account

for the elongation of the tie rod:

1

1 1

v

A

40 kN/m

6 m

x

(1)

B

B y

9 m

v

B

4 3

wL BL y

=− + =

8EI

3EI

BL

y

AE

1

1 1

(d)

B y

this equation is not quite correct. The error is a subtle, but

important, one. How is Equation (d) incorrect?

The upward direction has been defined as positive for beam

deflections. When tie rod (1) elongates, point B (the lower end of

the rod) moves downward. Since the compatibility equation pertains

to deflections of the beam, the tie-rod term on the right-hand

side of the equation should have a negative sign:

v

B

4 3

wL BL y BL y

=− + = −

8EI

3EI

AE

1

1 1

(e)

v

A

40 kN/m

6 m

x

(1)

B

9 m

v B

469

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!