01.11.2021 Views

Timothy A. Philpot - Mechanics of materials _ an integrated learning system-John Wiley (2017)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Method one. The first method is simply to substitute one of the θ s values into either

Equation (12.4) or Equation (12.6) and compute the corresponding shear stress. In addition

to giving the value of the maximum in-plane shear stress, this method has the advantage that

it directly associates a shear stress magnitude (including the proper sign) with the θ s angle.

Thus, given that shear stresses on orthogonal planes must be equal, the determination of the

stress for only one θ s angle is sufficient to define uniquely the shear stresses on both planes.

Since one is typically interested in finding both the principal stresses and the maximum

in-plane shear stress, an efficient computational approach for finding both the magnitude

and orientation of the maximum in-plane shear stress is as follows:

(a) From Equation (12.11), a specific value for θ p will be known.

(b) Depending on the sign of θ p and recognizing that θ p and θ s are always 45° apart, either

add or subtract 45° to find an orientation of a maximum in-plane shear stress plane θ s .

To obtain an angle θ s between +45° and −45° (inclusive), subtract 45° from a positive

value of θ p or add 45° to a negative value of θ p .

(c) Substitute the resulting value of θ s into either Equation (12.4) or Equation (12.6), and

compute the corresponding shear stress. The result is τ max , the maximum in-plane

shear stress.

(d) The result obtained from either Equation (12.4) or Equation (12.6) for θ s will furnish

both the magnitude and the sign of the maximum in-plane shear stress τ max . Obtaining

the sign is particularly valuable in this method because Method Two offers no direct

means for establishing the sign of τ max .

Method two. A general equation can be derived to give the magnitude of τ max by

substituting angle functions obtained from Equation (12.14) into Equation (12.6). The

result is

τ

max

which reduces to

σx − σ y ⎡ ± ( σx − σ y)/2

⎤ ⎡ ∓τ

xy

=− ⎢

⎥ + τ xy

2

2

2

⎢ ⎛ σx

− σ y⎞

σ σ

τ

τ

⎟ +

⎥ ⎢ ⎛ −

2

x y⎞

xy

⎥ ⎝

⎟ +

2 ⎣

⎢ 2

2

xy

503

PRINCIPAL STRESSES ANd

MAxIMuM SHEAR STRESS

τ

max

⎛ σx

− σ

2 ⎠

2

y⎞

2

⎟ + τ xy

(12.15)

Note that Equation (12.15) has the same magnitude as the second term of Equation (12.12).

From Equation (12.15), the sign of τ max is ambiguous. The maximum shear stress differs

from the minimum shear stress only in sign. Unlike normal stress, which can be either

tension or compression, the sign of the maximum in-plane shear stress has no physical

significance for the material behavior of a stressed body. The sign simply indicates the direction

in which the shear stress acts on a particular plane surface.

A useful relation between the principal and the maximum in-plane shear stress is

obtained from Equations (12.12) and (12.15) by subtracting the values for the two inplane

principal stresses and substituting the value of the radical from Equation (12.15).

The result is

τ

max

σ

=

− σ

p1 p2

2

(12.16)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!