strawman

Recommendations

Info

The initial response to this was on 26th January when I lodged the following complaintwith the local police force:102
18th November 2010. I attended Bury Magistrates Court at the request of Steven Oxborough, XXXXXXXXXX,Thetford, IP24 XXX tel. 01842 XXXXXX, in spite of the fact that he had failed to show any evidence that Iwas liable for Council Tax payments.I stated the facts briefly in court and within a few seconds, the magistrates ruled that I was in no way liablefor Mr Oxborough’s requested Council Tax payment. Because I was not involved in the matter in any way,they then required me to leave the courtroom.29th November 2010. In spite of the clear ruling of the Court, I received a letter from Mr Oxborough stating thathe intended to collect Council Tax from me anyway and charge me a further £65 for the unnecessary courthearing which he requested, and if I did not pay by 1st December 2010 that he would send bailiffs to removemy property and he would charge me further amounts for doing that. I wrote back stating that the Court hadruled that I was not liable in any way and that he had no justification for his demands.2nd December 2010. Mr Oxborough wrote demanding payment and stating that if payment was not made, thenhe would pass the matter to “our Bailiffs” for collection.7th December 2010. I wrote to Mr Oxborough, stating that in my opinion that should he undertake the actionswhich he was proposing, that it would be both unlawful and contempt of court.10th January 2011. A letter from Mr Oxborough, dated 5th January 2011 was delivered, stating that he hadpassed the matter to Rossendales Limited for collection on 10th January and that Rossendales Limitedwould be contacting me. No contact details for Rossendales Limited were provided. Just as the letter wasdelivered, an employee of Rossendales arrived. After some discussion, during which I informed him of theBury Magistrates Court’s ruling that I was not liable for the charge, he left some papers and went away.I wrote to Rossendales Limited informing them that they had no lawful standing in this matter, stating clearlythat they do not have my permission to involve themselves in my affairs in any way, that the Court had ruledthat I am not liable for any such debt, and requesting them to cease harassing me.I also wrote to Mr Oxborough, requesting him to cease harassing me as his continuing with this matterconstitutes the criminal offence of harassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.I also confirmed that there is nobody else living at this address and that I had written to Rossendales Limitedinforming them of the Courts ruling in this matter.15th January 2011. A letter dated 13th January was received from Rossendales stating that they intend tocontinue demanding payment (to them). I wrote back requesting that they show any lawful reason why Ishould pay them money, and again requesting that they stop harassing me.24th January 2011. A letter dated 20th January was received from Rossendales Limited, stating that they do notactually have any relevant authorising paperwork but that they continue to demand payment. I wrote backstating yet again that I am not liable for any such payment and again requesting them to stop harassing meover the matter.24th January 2011. A letter dated 20th January 2011 was received from Steven Oxborough claiming that he hadnotified me more than fourteen days in advance of Rossendales Limited visit on 10th January 2011.As of today’s date, 26th January 2011, I have now received six demand letters plus one demand visit from StevenOxborough or his agents. In the light of the clear ruling of Bury Magistrates Court that I personally am not liablefor these charges, Mr Steven Oxborough is continuing to harass me and there is no evidence that he has anyintention of ceasing. I have been courteous and polite in all of my dealing with him and yet he seems determinedto abuse his position of tax-collector and harass me. Consequently, I wish to press charges against him forharassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.The police then provided me with this reference:103
Page 1 and 2:
Meet Your StrawmanThis is a picture
Page 3 and 4:
not aware of these things, but by t
Page 5 and 6:
persuade you to represent your stra
Page 7 and 8:
They have a number of well-proven m
Page 9 and 10:
You need to remember that any finan
Page 11 and 12:
and what happened then was that the
Page 13 and 14:
You might wonder why they would wan
Page 15 and 16:
on the term of the mortgage contrac
Page 17 and 18:
Dealing With The PoliceYears ago, a
Page 19 and 20:
The change of ownership is shown by
Page 21 and 22:
in the business of fooling people,
Page 23 and 24:
remember, courts only deal with dis
Page 25 and 26:
People who have been caught in this
Page 27 and 28:
Isn't it great to be paying vast su
Page 29 and 30:
Mr Banker is doing very well out of
Page 31 and 32:
http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
Page 33 and 34:
Testing the Application of the LawI
Page 35 and 36:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 37 and 38:
37
Page 39 and 40:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 41 and 42:
The response was:41
Page 43 and 44:
Att. Ms L. Talbot,Forest Heath Dist
Page 45 and 46:
45
Page 47 and 48:
You speak of disputes and suggest t
Page 49 and 50:
Next, drawing the attention of the
Page 51 and 52: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 53 and 54: Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has l
Page 55 and 56: Whereas it is my understanding that
Page 57 and 58: (1) Exercise my “common law right
Page 59 and 60: 59
Page 61 and 62: Then to Forest Heath District Counc
Page 63 and 64: Court hearing 18/11/10:I then atten
Page 65 and 66: XXXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edm
Page 67 and 68: 67
Page 69 and 70: And this prompted the following rep
Page 71 and 72: Yours faithfully,Patrick-James of t
Page 73 and 74: 73
Page 75 and 76: Please notice that this letter is t
Page 77 and 78: incorrect as no Magistrates Court i
Page 79 and 80: This is a very clear and well-prese
Page 81 and 82: Anyway, may I again urge you to sto
Page 83 and 84: 83
Page 85 and 86: 85
Page 87 and 88: 87
Page 89 and 90: The first response was immediate an
Page 91 and 92: Steven Oxborough,East Cambridgeshir
Page 93 and 94: 4. The signatures of both parties.
Page 95 and 96: Your Ref: 71146498STATEMENT OF ACCO
Page 97 and 98: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 99 and 100: To which the response was:99
Page 101: I state again that no debt is owed
Page 105 and 106: aware that I would charge you for m
Page 107 and 108: 4. Proof that no employee or repres
Page 109 and 110: XXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmun
Page 111 and 112: Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYE
Page 113 and 114: As a result of your continuing hara
Page 115 and 116: A letter was then sent to the Chief
Page 117 and 118: 117
Page 119 and 120: Let me again state for the record,
Page 121 and 122: This, of course, ignores everything
Page 123 and 124: To which the response was:123
Page 125 and 126: No response has been made to this a
Page 127 and 128: To which the response was:In care o
Page 129 and 130: them, estoppel has been established
Page 133 and 134: 133
Page 137 and 138: In spite of estoppel having been so
Page 139 and 140: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 141 and 142: 141
Page 143 and 144: To which the response was:XXXXXXXXX
Page 145 and 146: TV Licence:Having recently become a
Page 147 and 148: need your permission to watch telev
Page 149 and 150: 149
Page 151 and 152: 151
Page 153 and 154:
153
Page 155 and 156:
The inner “City of London” is a
Page 157 and 158:
157
Page 159 and 160:
159
show all

strawman

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?