strawman

Recommendations

Info

XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmunds,SuffolkNear IP28 XXX29th November 2010Att. Steven Oxborough,Forest Heath District Council,District Office,College Heath Road,Mildenhall,SuffolkIP28 7EYNOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATIONYour Ref: 71146498Dear Steven Oxborough,I am today in receipt of the attached letter which was delivered to my home, and I should be obliged if you wouldclarify the following queries:1. Your letter is dated 18th November 2010 and yet it was not delivered for 11 days which is 78% of the 14 dayperiod mentioned. Why was this?2. I, the human being Patrick-James of the Kelly family am the only person living at XXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge andthat was made clear in court. Why then are you sending correspondence to the legal entity “MR PATRICKKELLY” which does not reside at that address?3. As I stated in court, I do not believe that any such legal entity as “MR PATRICK KELLY” was ever created in oraround the time of my birth and I challenge you to produce a copy of the Birth Certificate used to create thatlegal entity. I do not believe any such entity exists, and I hereby state categorically, that no such entityresides at my address.4. As there seems to be some confusion on your part, let me also state clearly that all goods, chattels,possessions and items of value at XXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, belong to me, the human being, and none ofthem are owned by the legal fictional entity against which you are attempting to levy charges. If you wish, Iwill swear an affidavit to that effect. Consequently, there is no reason whatsoever for you to request bailiffs tovisit this address. Would you please confirm that you no longer intend to request their visit.5. Let me state once more, That I, the human being Patrick-James of the Kelly family, am not a member of thesociety whose regulations you are attempting to enforce and so I am not bound by any of those regulations.Also, I do not consent to represent the legal fiction ‘person’ “MR PATRICK KELLY” in this matter and may Iyet again draw your attention to the fact that the court has ruled that I, the human being, am not the personwhich you are trying to charge. That is, I, the human being, am not in any respect liable for any chargeslevied against “MR PATRICK KELLY”.6. To avoid any possible confusion, let me remind you that the charges for a visit from a bailiff or other person of asimilar nature has already been specified in my FEES SCHEDULE, namely that there will be a charge of FIVEHUNDRED BRITISH POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR, or portion thereof, if being questioned, interrogatedor in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated by a bailiff or similar person. This charge will beagainst both the ‘person’ requesting the visit, namely Forest Heath District Council, and the person or personsacting on those instructions.7. Would you please state why the attached letter was not signed.8. There appears to be a factual error in your letter as it states “The law requires me to inform you …” while in factit is not the law but merely a statute or statutory instrument which requires this and neither of those are itemsof law. Would you please clarify why your letter states that it is the law when in fact, it is not.70
Yours faithfully,Patrick-James of the Kelly family as commonly knownWITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights ReservedNo assured value, No liabilitycc Anglia Revenues Partnership, Breckland House, St Nicholas Street, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 1BTNo response was received, so on the first of the month an invoice and a statement were sent:71
Page 1 and 2:
Meet Your StrawmanThis is a picture
Page 3 and 4:
not aware of these things, but by t
Page 5 and 6:
persuade you to represent your stra
Page 7 and 8:
They have a number of well-proven m
Page 9 and 10:
You need to remember that any finan
Page 11 and 12:
and what happened then was that the
Page 13 and 14:
You might wonder why they would wan
Page 15 and 16:
on the term of the mortgage contrac
Page 17 and 18:
Dealing With The PoliceYears ago, a
Page 19 and 20: The change of ownership is shown by
Page 21 and 22: in the business of fooling people,
Page 23 and 24: remember, courts only deal with dis
Page 25 and 26: People who have been caught in this
Page 27 and 28: Isn't it great to be paying vast su
Page 29 and 30: Mr Banker is doing very well out of
Page 31 and 32: http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
Page 33 and 34: Testing the Application of the LawI
Page 35 and 36: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 37 and 38: 37
Page 41 and 42: The response was:41
Page 43 and 44: Att. Ms L. Talbot,Forest Heath Dist
Page 45 and 46: 45
Page 47 and 48: You speak of disputes and suggest t
Page 49 and 50: Next, drawing the attention of the
Page 53 and 54: Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has l
Page 55 and 56: Whereas it is my understanding that
Page 57 and 58: (1) Exercise my “common law right
Page 59 and 60: 59
Page 61 and 62: Then to Forest Heath District Counc
Page 63 and 64: Court hearing 18/11/10:I then atten
Page 65 and 66: XXXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edm
Page 67 and 68: 67
Page 69: And this prompted the following rep
Page 73 and 74: 73
Page 75 and 76: Please notice that this letter is t
Page 77 and 78: incorrect as no Magistrates Court i
Page 79 and 80: This is a very clear and well-prese
Page 81 and 82: Anyway, may I again urge you to sto
Page 83 and 84: 83
Page 85 and 86: 85
Page 87 and 88: 87
Page 89 and 90: The first response was immediate an
Page 91 and 92: Steven Oxborough,East Cambridgeshir
Page 93 and 94: 4. The signatures of both parties.
Page 95 and 96: Your Ref: 71146498STATEMENT OF ACCO
Page 97 and 98: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 99 and 100: To which the response was:99
Page 101 and 102: I state again that no debt is owed
Page 103 and 104: 18th November 2010. I attended Bury
Page 105 and 106: aware that I would charge you for m
Page 107 and 108: 4. Proof that no employee or repres
Page 109 and 110: XXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmun
Page 111 and 112: Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYE
Page 113 and 114: As a result of your continuing hara
Page 115 and 116: A letter was then sent to the Chief
Page 117 and 118: 117
Page 119 and 120: Let me again state for the record,
Page 121 and 122:
This, of course, ignores everything
Page 123 and 124:
To which the response was:123
Page 125 and 126:
No response has been made to this a
Page 127 and 128:
To which the response was:In care o
Page 129 and 130:
them, estoppel has been established
Page 131 and 132:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 133 and 134:
133
Page 135 and 136:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 137 and 138:
In spite of estoppel having been so
Page 139 and 140:
In care of:XXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 141 and 142:
141
Page 143 and 144:
To which the response was:XXXXXXXXX
Page 145 and 146:
TV Licence:Having recently become a
Page 147 and 148:
need your permission to watch telev
Page 149 and 150:
149
Page 151 and 152:
151
Page 153 and 154:
153
Page 155 and 156:
The inner “City of London” is a
Page 157 and 158:
157
Page 159 and 160:
159
show all

strawman

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?