strawman

Recommendations

Info

And then a request for clarification to the court:XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmunds,SuffolkNear IP28 XXX8th November 2010Att. Justices Chief Executive,The Magistrates Court,Shire Hall,Bury St Edmunds,SuffolkIP33 1HFNOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATIONAccount number: 71146498Summons number: 104259Dear Sir,I am in receipt of your communication dated 5th November 2010, stating that you are maintaining an appointmentat your place of business on 18th November at 10:30 am. As I can see no basis whatsoever for this, would youplease clarify the following points:1. Forest Heath District Council state that they wish to be paid £370 by the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMESKELLY” whom they mistakenly believe to be residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk. I offered torepresent the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” if they could demonstrate any reasonable basisfor my doing so and if they could provide evidence that their demand constituted a lawful (not ‘legal’) debt.They have failed to do that and so estoppel has been fully established at this time. This being the case, onwhat grounds are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November?2. Joinder has not been established in this matter, nor will it ever be as I do not consent to it and I have stated thisclearly. On what grounds therefore are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November andbetween whom?3. As I have already stated clearly, I am not a member of any named society and consequently, you have nojurisdiction over me, Patrick: Kelly the man. I invited Forest Heath District Council to present any evidence tothe contrary and they were unable to do so. That being the case, on what grounds are you proposing to holdan adjudication meeting on 18th November and why are you telling me about it?For the avoidance of doubt let me state that I do not consent to have dealings with a court de facto and requireany dealings to be through a court de jure in the unlikely event that any such dealings were to become necessary.For further clarification, let me state that I do not consent to being involved in any supposed adjudication on 18thNovember at your premises and I attach herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolityPatrick: of the Kelly familyWITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights ReservedNo assured value, No liability60
Then to Forest Heath District Council:XXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmunds,SuffolkNear IP28 XXX11th November 2010Att. Steven Oxborough,Forest Heath District Council,District Office,College Heath Road,Mildenhall,SuffolkIP28 7EYNOTICEYour Ref: 71146498Dear Steven Oxborough,You have invited me to meet with you for a face to face consultation on 18th November 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in BurySt Edmunds. Although there is no obligation, I accept your invitation and shall attend your meeting. My chargesare as follows:Fee for attending any one meeting at any location: £500 (FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS) plusTravelling expenses from and to XXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, calculated at 45 pence per mile or part thereof plusany parking or other charges at cost.These amounts are payable immediately and an additional interest charge of 1% per month or part thereof for latepayment, compounded monthly. VAT does not apply.As estoppel has already been established in this matter and as you are no doubt aware that no de facto court candeal directly with a human being such as myself, and since you have been informed that I do not consent to bebound by statutes or statutory instruments and only by the Common Law of the land, it seems reasonable toconsider that your continuing pursuit of this matter is frivolous. Consequently, from this time forward, I shall becharging £50 (FIFTY POUNDS) per letter should it become necessary for me to communicate with you, and sinceyou have chosen to involve the Bury St Edmunds Magistrates Court in this matter, I shall keep them informed ofany additional correspondence, and that will be charged at a further £50 (FIFTY POUNDS) per letter.Let me state again, that under no circumstances will I allow Joinder to be established during our meeting at BurySt Edmunds whether overtly or covertly.Yours faithfully,Patrick: Kelly as commonly knownWITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights ReservedNo assured value, No liabilitycc Bury St Edmunds Magistrates Court. Summons number: 10425961
Page 1 and 2:
Meet Your StrawmanThis is a picture
Page 3 and 4:
not aware of these things, but by t
Page 5 and 6:
persuade you to represent your stra
Page 7 and 8:
They have a number of well-proven m
Page 9 and 10: You need to remember that any finan
Page 11 and 12: and what happened then was that the
Page 13 and 14: You might wonder why they would wan
Page 15 and 16: on the term of the mortgage contrac
Page 17 and 18: Dealing With The PoliceYears ago, a
Page 19 and 20: The change of ownership is shown by
Page 21 and 22: in the business of fooling people,
Page 23 and 24: remember, courts only deal with dis
Page 25 and 26: People who have been caught in this
Page 27 and 28: Isn't it great to be paying vast su
Page 29 and 30: Mr Banker is doing very well out of
Page 31 and 32: http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
Page 33 and 34: Testing the Application of the LawI
Page 35 and 36: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 37 and 38: 37
Page 41 and 42: The response was:41
Page 43 and 44: Att. Ms L. Talbot,Forest Heath Dist
Page 45 and 46: 45
Page 47 and 48: You speak of disputes and suggest t
Page 49 and 50: Next, drawing the attention of the
Page 53 and 54: Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has l
Page 55 and 56: Whereas it is my understanding that
Page 57 and 58: (1) Exercise my “common law right
Page 59: 59
Page 63 and 64: Court hearing 18/11/10:I then atten
Page 65 and 66: XXXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edm
Page 67 and 68: 67
Page 69 and 70: And this prompted the following rep
Page 71 and 72: Yours faithfully,Patrick-James of t
Page 73 and 74: 73
Page 75 and 76: Please notice that this letter is t
Page 77 and 78: incorrect as no Magistrates Court i
Page 79 and 80: This is a very clear and well-prese
Page 81 and 82: Anyway, may I again urge you to sto
Page 83 and 84: 83
Page 85 and 86: 85
Page 87 and 88: 87
Page 89 and 90: The first response was immediate an
Page 91 and 92: Steven Oxborough,East Cambridgeshir
Page 93 and 94: 4. The signatures of both parties.
Page 95 and 96: Your Ref: 71146498STATEMENT OF ACCO
Page 97 and 98: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 99 and 100: To which the response was:99
Page 101 and 102: I state again that no debt is owed
Page 103 and 104: 18th November 2010. I attended Bury
Page 105 and 106: aware that I would charge you for m
Page 107 and 108: 4. Proof that no employee or repres
Page 109 and 110: XXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmun
Page 111 and 112:
Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYE
Page 113 and 114:
As a result of your continuing hara
Page 115 and 116:
A letter was then sent to the Chief
Page 117 and 118:
117
Page 119 and 120:
Let me again state for the record,
Page 121 and 122:
This, of course, ignores everything
Page 123 and 124:
To which the response was:123
Page 125 and 126:
No response has been made to this a
Page 127 and 128:
To which the response was:In care o
Page 129 and 130:
them, estoppel has been established
Page 131 and 132:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 133 and 134:
133
Page 135 and 136:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
Page 137 and 138:
In spite of estoppel having been so
Page 139 and 140:
In care of:XXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
Page 141 and 142:
141
Page 143 and 144:
To which the response was:XXXXXXXXX
Page 145 and 146:
TV Licence:Having recently become a
Page 147 and 148:
need your permission to watch telev
Page 149 and 150:
149
Page 151 and 152:
151
Page 153 and 154:
153
Page 155 and 156:
The inner “City of London” is a
Page 157 and 158:
157
Page 159 and 160:
159
show all

strawman

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?