strawman

You speak of disputes and suggest that a de facto Magistrates Court might be called on to adjudicate in a dispute
between us. I assure you that there is no dispute between us as I have already agreed to pay any amount
lawfully owed by me, the human being. I have repeatedly asked you to demonstrate that there is any lawful
charge outstanding against me, and as of this date, you have failed to present even one valid piece of evidence
that there is any such charge against me, the human being. You appear to be unaware of the difference between
“legal” and “lawful”. None of the “legal” measures of which you speak, apply to me as I do not consent to be
bound by those legal measures and you have not presented any evidence that I am a member of any named
society which would cause me to be bound by them (if I were, then I would resign from it immediately).
To summarise the present situation: You, the legal entity known as the District Council, have invited me to pay
Council Tax on an on-going basis. I have asked you to show evidence of any lawful debt owed by me, the human
being Patrick: Kelly, agreeing to pay any amount which is lawfully owed by me. You did not do that within the ten
days allowed. Consequently, I have invited you to present any such evidence by 21st October 2010 as should
you be unable or unwilling to do so, that will constitute tacit agreement on your part that there is no outstanding
lawful debt owed by me, the human being.
As you are already aware, the evidence which you need to provide in order to proceed further in this matter is:
1. Proof of your claim that I am a legal ‘person’, and not a human being.
2. Proof that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
3. Proof that you understand the difference between 'legal' and a 'lawful'.
4. Proof of your claim that I am the legal fiction 'person' MR PATRICK KELLY, being the entity to which your
paperwork was addressed, and not the human being Patrick: of the Kelly family, as commonly called.
5. Proof of your claim that I am a member of a named society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you
enforce.
6. Proof of your claim that there is a nameable society to which I belong and that the regulations of that society
state that they apply to me within that named society.
As you are aware, you have not provided a single one of these.
I have taken the liberty of presuming that your letter was intended for me, Patrick Kelly. In it you
mention “Mr Patrick Kelly” and “Mr Kelly” and I as am neither of those fictional legal entities, I should be
obliged if you would in future, address me by my name of Patrick: Kelly.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,
Patrick: Kelly as commonly known
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
There was no response.
47