15.12.2022 Views

strawman

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

And then a request for clarification to the court:

XXXXXXXXXXXX,

Red Lodge,

Bury St Edmunds,

Suffolk

Near IP28 XXX

8th November 2010

Att. Justices Chief Executive,

The Magistrates Court,

Shire Hall,

Bury St Edmunds,

Suffolk

IP33 1HF

NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

Account number: 71146498

Summons number: 104259

Dear Sir,

I am in receipt of your communication dated 5th November 2010, stating that you are maintaining an appointment

at your place of business on 18th November at 10:30 am. As I can see no basis whatsoever for this, would you

please clarify the following points:

1. Forest Heath District Council state that they wish to be paid £370 by the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES

KELLY” whom they mistakenly believe to be residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk. I offered to

represent the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” if they could demonstrate any reasonable basis

for my doing so and if they could provide evidence that their demand constituted a lawful (not ‘legal’) debt.

They have failed to do that and so estoppel has been fully established at this time. This being the case, on

what grounds are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November?

2. Joinder has not been established in this matter, nor will it ever be as I do not consent to it and I have stated this

clearly. On what grounds therefore are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November and

between whom?

3. As I have already stated clearly, I am not a member of any named society and consequently, you have no

jurisdiction over me, Patrick: Kelly the man. I invited Forest Heath District Council to present any evidence to

the contrary and they were unable to do so. That being the case, on what grounds are you proposing to hold

an adjudication meeting on 18th November and why are you telling me about it?

For the avoidance of doubt let me state that I do not consent to have dealings with a court de facto and require

any dealings to be through a court de jure in the unlikely event that any such dealings were to become necessary.

For further clarification, let me state that I do not consent to being involved in any supposed adjudication on 18th

November at your premises and I attach herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.

Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity

Patrick: of the Kelly family

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved

No assured value, No liability

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!