strawman
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
And then a request for clarification to the court:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,
Red Lodge,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
Near IP28 XXX
8th November 2010
Att. Justices Chief Executive,
The Magistrates Court,
Shire Hall,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
IP33 1HF
NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
Account number: 71146498
Summons number: 104259
Dear Sir,
I am in receipt of your communication dated 5th November 2010, stating that you are maintaining an appointment
at your place of business on 18th November at 10:30 am. As I can see no basis whatsoever for this, would you
please clarify the following points:
1. Forest Heath District Council state that they wish to be paid £370 by the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES
KELLY” whom they mistakenly believe to be residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk. I offered to
represent the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” if they could demonstrate any reasonable basis
for my doing so and if they could provide evidence that their demand constituted a lawful (not ‘legal’) debt.
They have failed to do that and so estoppel has been fully established at this time. This being the case, on
what grounds are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November?
2. Joinder has not been established in this matter, nor will it ever be as I do not consent to it and I have stated this
clearly. On what grounds therefore are you proposing to hold an adjudication meeting on 18th November and
between whom?
3. As I have already stated clearly, I am not a member of any named society and consequently, you have no
jurisdiction over me, Patrick: Kelly the man. I invited Forest Heath District Council to present any evidence to
the contrary and they were unable to do so. That being the case, on what grounds are you proposing to hold
an adjudication meeting on 18th November and why are you telling me about it?
For the avoidance of doubt let me state that I do not consent to have dealings with a court de facto and require
any dealings to be through a court de jure in the unlikely event that any such dealings were to become necessary.
For further clarification, let me state that I do not consent to being involved in any supposed adjudication on 18th
November at your premises and I attach herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity
Patrick: of the Kelly family
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
No assured value, No liability
60