strawman

Please notice that this letter is to you and not to the Forest Heath District Council. It seems only reasonable to
draw to your attention the fact that should you choose to involve a Debt Collection Agency, you personally, would
place yourself in a hazardous position in that you would have instructed a Debt Collection Agency to recover
goods belonging to a non-existent legal fiction person “MR PATRICK KELLY” which supposedly resides at
XXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge. This is in spite of the fact that I have informed you that there is no such person living
at that address and that no goods belonging to this notional person are located there.
This is a situation which has significant danger for you personally. Should it happen that your appointed agent
removes any item belonging to me (the human being) then that constitutes theft, and the visit constitutes
harassment, and your joining with your superior who instructs you and your agent who is instructed by you,
constitutes conspiracy to commit a crime.
You deal regularly with the Bury St Edmunds Magistrates Court. That is a court de facto which deals with statutes
and statutory instruments, both of which are the Law of the Waters. That court holds “hearings” before
“adjudicators” and can only deal with legal fiction ‘persons’ and humans who consent to represent those legal
fictions.
You are now involving yourself with a matter which is totally different. It is a criminal matter which is dealt with by
a court de jure, which deals with “prosecutions” and which is resided over by “Judges” who deal with Common
Law which applies directly to humans, as it is the Law of the Land. If you, personally, were convicted by a court
de jure, you would then have a criminal record which would make it difficult to get a job and Forest Heath District
Council might not be able to continue your present employment. You, personally, would be liable for whatever
measures the court decides to impose, and so you need to be aware of the impact on yourself and your family
should matters reach that point.
Let me stress again that the adjudicators at the hearing in Court 3 of Bury St Edmunds Magistrates Court, held on
18th November 2010 in relation to summons 104259, ruled that I, the human being living at XXXXXXXXXXXX, am
not the legal fiction person “MR PATRICK KELLY” from which you are demanding Council Tax payments with
menaces. Consequently, you will be in contempt of court should your agent take any item belonging to me. That
action is the criminal offence of theft and you, personally, are responsible for that act, and so you personally are
the person committing that criminal act through your agent. If that should happen, please be advised that I will be
pressing separate criminal charges against you personally, for theft, harassment and conspiracy.
Quite apart from the fact that any such actions will result in substantial monetary charges against you personally,
in that you personally directed the actions which caused the various breaches of the law, it would be sensible for
you to discontinue the attempts to seize non-existing goods supposedly belonging to a non-existing legal fiction
person which does not reside at my present address. Please bear in mind that you have been informed that there
are no such goods or chattels at this address, that I have never seen any evidence that there is any such legal
fiction person as “MR PATRICK KELLY” as my parents never requested the Registrar of Births and Deaths to
register my birth, supplying the names PATRICK and KELLY, and I have requested that you produce a copy of
75