strawman

XXXXXXXXXXXX,
Red Lodge,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
Near IP28 XXX
4th October 2010
Att. Lucy Talbot,
Forest Heath District Council,
District Office,
College Heath Road,
Mildenhall,
Suffolk
IP28 7EY
Your Ref: 71146498
Dear Lucy,
I am today in receipt of your letter dated 1st October 2010. For the avoidance of doubt, let me clarify a number of
points.
I find it most interesting that you suggest that a local court might offer to adjudicate in a dispute between us,
considering that there is no dispute. I have already granted you conditional agreement to represent the fictional
‘person’ MR PATRICK KELLY and pay any lawfully incurred debts, and consequently, there is no dispute between
us and hence nothing on which to adjudicate.
The copy documentation which you sent, demonstrates clearly that I am the human Patrick: Kelly while your
demand for payment is to the legal fiction ‘MR PATRICK KELLY’. As you are aware, I have undertaken to pay
any amount lawfully owed by myself, the human being.
You mention the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and you allege that
(a) I am a person – which I most strongly deny, and
(b) That I, the human being, am deemed liable under that Act.
Let me draw your attention to the fact that statutes and statutory instruments only apply to human beings who
consent to be bound by them, and I hereby state categorically, that I, the human being Patrick: Kelly, do not
consent to be bound by any such instruments.
I grant you that the legal fiction ‘MR PATRICK KELLY’ which you seem to be confusing with myself, the human
being Patrick: Kelly, is indeed bound by those instruments. Further, I have agreed, within the time limit stated, to
represent that legal fiction provided that there is any lawful basis for my doing so.
To that end, I have requested that you demonstrate that lawful basis by:
1. Providing proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being. To date, this you have not done.
2. Providing proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking
and again, you have not yet provided this proof.
3. Providing proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and 'lawful' and I am advised, that in your
position, not knowing the difference would be considered gross negligence. At this time, you have not provided
this proof and the contents of your letter suggests that you are not aware of the difference.
4. Providing proof of claim that I am a legal fiction 'person' MR PATRICK KELLY, being the entity to which your
original paperwork was addressed, and not Patrick: of the Kelly family, as commonly called. I have not yet
received this proof from you.
39