15.12.2022 Views

strawman

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In care of:

XXXXXXXXXXX

Red Lodge

Bury St Edmunds

Suffolk

Near: [IP28 XXX]

15th January 2011

To:

Bailiff Manager

Rossendales Ltd.

Wavell House

Holcombe Road

Helmshore

Rossendale

BB4 4NB

Re: 5566260

Notice of Request To Cease Harassment.

Dear Sir,

I am in receipt of your letter dated 13th January 2011. You are seriously misinformed. For maximum

clarity, I will list the relevant issues here:

1. You appear to be making demands on me, in spite of your correspondence being addressed to a

‘person’ which does not exist. Your payment giro slips make this perfectly clear as they bear the

name of your company. This is a demand between two parties and for it to be valid, there has to be a

valid contract agreement between those two parties, bearing the wet-ink signature of both parties. I

am not aware of any such contract, so I need you to confirm the alleged debt by sending me a certified

copy of a contract between myself and Rossendales Limited. If you do not, or can not provide any

such contract within the next fourteen days from the date of this letter, then it constitutes binding legal

agreement on your part that no such debt exists between Rossendales Limited and myself and estoppel

is therefore established beyond any shadow of doubt. No third party can be involved in this matter,

just Rossendales Limited and myself.

2. You claim that your actions are based on a Liability Order. I have seen no such order, so you need to

send me that Order or a certified copy of it, to verify your claim. No court has ever provided me with

any such written Order, which seems remarkable in the light of your claim.

3. You need to be aware that I attended Bury Magistrates Court on 18th November 2010 in connection

with the matter of Council Tax which was the concern of Forest Heath District Council. When I was

in court I provided the relevant details, including the fact that estoppel had already been established

between myself and Forest Heath District Council in the matter, and the ruling of the Court was that I,

the human was NOT the person who was the subject of the Council Tax application by Forest Heath

District Council, and as a consequence of that, I was required to leave the court as I was not involved

in the matter in any way. Please be very careful to note that the Court has ruled that I AM NOT THE

NAMED DEFENDANT in this matter. Consequently, any attempts to persuade me to make any

related payments is an attempt to get me to pay the debt of some other person. Actually, considering

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!