strawman

and unprovoked harassment. As I have already stated, I believed, and still believe, that I was fully entitled to
write to Steven on those two occasions, and yet you see that as my harassing him. How is it that Norfolk
Constabulary and Suffolk Constabulary view the same law in these two completely opposing ways?
7. It was stated that you are aware of my complaints to Suffolk Constabulary. Would it not have been a
reasonable option to pass Steven’s complaint to them as part of this ongoing matter?
I appreciate your assistance in clarifying these matters.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,
Patrick-James of the Kelly family
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Indefeasible, Rights reserved.
The situation with Steven Oxborough
In order to clarify the issues, here is a brief summary of the events to date:
1. Forest Heath District Council made a claim that I was liable to Council Tax. I requested them to provide
evidence to support that claim which I disputed, and they were given 28 days in which to support that claim.
They failed to do so and in law that constitutes ‘estoppel’ which is tacit, legally-binding agreement on their part
that no such debt exists.
2. Steven was fully aware of this and yet requested that I attend bury Magistrates Court on 18th November 2010.
I attended and addressed the court which immediately ruled that I was not liable for the Council Tax which
Steven was trying to levy. Steven was present in court at that time and he is fully aware of the court’s ruling in
the matter.
3. In spite of being aware of the court’s ruling, since then he has repeatedly demanded payment from me in direct
defiance of the court ruling which stated that I am not personally liable for any such debt.
4. It is difficult to see any way in which such continuing demands could not be deemed by any reasonable,
disinterested party, as being harassment when the clear court ruling is considered.
Then there was a letter from Sharon Jones of Forest Heath District Council which seems
much given to sending letters under a wide variety of letterheads:
132