strawman

1. A letter addressed to MR PATRICK KELLY was sent to my address in September 2010, requesting the
payment of Council Tax. Please note the ‘person’ to whom the request was made:
2. I informed Forest Heath District Council that I am not MR PATRICK KELLY and stated that I would certainly pay
any amount lawfully owed by myself, the human being, and requesting that evidence of any such lawful debt
were presented as the first step in the payment process.
3. No such evidence was presented, so Forest Heath District Council was given a very generous 28-day period in
which to present any such evidence, and made aware that their failure to present any such evidence is deemed
in law to be “estoppel”, that is, full, legally-binding agreement that no such debt is owed.
4. After the 28-day period, as no evidence whatsoever was presented to indicate any form of lawful debt between
myself and Forest Heath District Council, estoppel was established. That means that Forest Heath District
Council has given full legally-binding agreement that no such debt is owed by my myself, the human being.
5. In spite of the fact that there is full legally-binding agreement between Forest Heath District Council and myself
that I do not owe Forest Heath District Council anything, Steven Oxborough requested that I attend a hearing in
the Bury Magistrates Court on 18th November 2010. Prior to the hearing, I sent the court a copy of all of the
correspondence between myself and Forest Heath District Council, drawing their attention to the fact that
estoppel had already been established and that there was no disagreement between the parties on which they
could adjudicate.
6. I attended Bury Magistrates Court on 18th November 2010 and upon being asked, I informed the court of who I
am and stated that since no Birth Certificate had been applied for by my parents and subsequently created by
the Registrar of Births and Deaths in or around the time of my birth, in the name PATRICK KELLY or PATRICK
JAMES KELLY, that as far as I am aware, no such legal entity was ever created. The court conferred for less
than thirty seconds and then ruled that I am not MR PATRICK KELLY and so I was requested to leave the court
since I was not involved in the Council Tax application being presented by Steven Oxborough on behalf of
Forest Heath District Council. The clerk of the court expressed his doubts, in the light of the evidence
presented to the court, that any such ‘person’ as MR PATRICK KELLY actually exists.
7. As you and Steven both seem unable to understand this, let me quote the opening section of a recent Council
Tax hearing:
On 11th January 2011, in front of witnesses in the county court of Birkenhead, the court conceded the right of
Roger Hayes to act as “third-party representative” for MR ROGER HAYES, thus confirming the fact that they are
two entirely separate entities. The exchange was as follows:
Judge: Can we first find out who is in the court, is MR ROGER HAYES in the court?
Roger: Sir, I am third-party representative for MR ROGER HAYES.
Judge: Are you MR ROGER HAYES?
Roger: No sir, I am the third-party representative for MR ROGER HAYES, you may address me as ‘Roger’.
Judge: I will not address you as ‘Roger’, I will call you ‘MR HAYES’.
Roger: Sir, I am not ‘MR HAYES’, the court is required to address me as I request and I request that you address
me as ‘Roger’.
110