15.12.2022 Views

strawman

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

XXXXXXXXXXXX,

Red Lodge,

Bury St Edmunds,

Suffolk

Near IP28 XXX

8th November 2010

Att. Steven Oxborough,

Forest Heath District Council,

District Office,

College Heath Road,

Mildenhall,

Suffolk

IP28 7EY

NOTICE

Your Ref: 71146498

Dear Steven Oxborough,

I am in receipt of a communication from you dated 4th November 2010 and addressed to “Mr Patrick Kelly” and

saying “Mr Kelly”. May I draw your attention to the fact that I am a man, namely, Patrick of the Kelly family and

not a person. You state that you wish to have a meeting on 18th November at 10:30 am. As I can see no basis

whatsoever for this, would you please clarify the following points:

1. You stated that you wish to be paid £370 by the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” whom you

mistakenly believe to be residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk. I offered to represent the legal

fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” if you could demonstrate any reasonable basis for my doing so and

if you could provide evidence that your demand constituted a lawful (not ‘legal’) debt. You failed to do that

and so estoppel has been fully established at this time. This being the case, on what grounds are you

proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November?

2. Joinder has not been established in this matter, nor will it ever be as I do not consent to it and I have stated this

clearly. On what grounds therefore are you proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November and between

whom?

3. As I have already stated clearly, I am not a member of any named society and consequently, you have no

jurisdiction over me, Patrick: Kelly the man. I invited you to present any evidence to the contrary and you

failed to do so. That being the case, on what grounds are you proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November

and why are you telling me about it?

For the avoidance of doubt let me state that I do not consent to have dealings with a court de facto and require

any dealings to be through a court de jure in the unlikely event that any such dealings were to become necessary.

For further clarification, let me state that I do not consent to being involved in any supposed adjudication on 18th

November and I attach herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.

Yours faithfully,

Patrick: Kelly as commonly known

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved

No assured value, No liability

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!