strawman
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
XXXXXXXXXXXX,
Red Lodge,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
Near IP28 XXX
8th November 2010
Att. Steven Oxborough,
Forest Heath District Council,
District Office,
College Heath Road,
Mildenhall,
Suffolk
IP28 7EY
NOTICE
Your Ref: 71146498
Dear Steven Oxborough,
I am in receipt of a communication from you dated 4th November 2010 and addressed to “Mr Patrick Kelly” and
saying “Mr Kelly”. May I draw your attention to the fact that I am a man, namely, Patrick of the Kelly family and
not a person. You state that you wish to have a meeting on 18th November at 10:30 am. As I can see no basis
whatsoever for this, would you please clarify the following points:
1. You stated that you wish to be paid £370 by the legal fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” whom you
mistakenly believe to be residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk. I offered to represent the legal
fiction person “PATRICK JAMES KELLY” if you could demonstrate any reasonable basis for my doing so and
if you could provide evidence that your demand constituted a lawful (not ‘legal’) debt. You failed to do that
and so estoppel has been fully established at this time. This being the case, on what grounds are you
proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November?
2. Joinder has not been established in this matter, nor will it ever be as I do not consent to it and I have stated this
clearly. On what grounds therefore are you proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November and between
whom?
3. As I have already stated clearly, I am not a member of any named society and consequently, you have no
jurisdiction over me, Patrick: Kelly the man. I invited you to present any evidence to the contrary and you
failed to do so. That being the case, on what grounds are you proposing to hold a meeting on 18th November
and why are you telling me about it?
For the avoidance of doubt let me state that I do not consent to have dealings with a court de facto and require
any dealings to be through a court de jure in the unlikely event that any such dealings were to become necessary.
For further clarification, let me state that I do not consent to being involved in any supposed adjudication on 18th
November and I attach herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.
Yours faithfully,
Patrick: Kelly as commonly known
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
No assured value, No liability
51