strawman

XXXXXXXXXXXX,
Red Lodge,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
Near IP28 XXX
29th November 2010
Att. Steven Oxborough,
Forest Heath District Council,
District Office,
College Heath Road,
Mildenhall,
Suffolk
IP28 7EY
NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
Your Ref: 71146498
Dear Steven Oxborough,
I am today in receipt of the attached letter which was delivered to my home, and I should be obliged if you would
clarify the following queries:
1. Your letter is dated 18th November 2010 and yet it was not delivered for 11 days which is 78% of the 14 day
period mentioned. Why was this?
2. I, the human being Patrick-James of the Kelly family am the only person living at XXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge and
that was made clear in court. Why then are you sending correspondence to the legal entity “MR PATRICK
KELLY” which does not reside at that address?
3. As I stated in court, I do not believe that any such legal entity as “MR PATRICK KELLY” was ever created in or
around the time of my birth and I challenge you to produce a copy of the Birth Certificate used to create that
legal entity. I do not believe any such entity exists, and I hereby state categorically, that no such entity
resides at my address.
4. As there seems to be some confusion on your part, let me also state clearly that all goods, chattels,
possessions and items of value at XXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, belong to me, the human being, and none of
them are owned by the legal fictional entity against which you are attempting to levy charges. If you wish, I
will swear an affidavit to that effect. Consequently, there is no reason whatsoever for you to request bailiffs to
visit this address. Would you please confirm that you no longer intend to request their visit.
5. Let me state once more, That I, the human being Patrick-James of the Kelly family, am not a member of the
society whose regulations you are attempting to enforce and so I am not bound by any of those regulations.
Also, I do not consent to represent the legal fiction ‘person’ “MR PATRICK KELLY” in this matter and may I
yet again draw your attention to the fact that the court has ruled that I, the human being, am not the person
which you are trying to charge. That is, I, the human being, am not in any respect liable for any charges
levied against “MR PATRICK KELLY”.
6. To avoid any possible confusion, let me remind you that the charges for a visit from a bailiff or other person of a
similar nature has already been specified in my FEES SCHEDULE, namely that there will be a charge of FIVE
HUNDRED BRITISH POUNDS STERLING PER HOUR, or portion thereof, if being questioned, interrogated
or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated by a bailiff or similar person. This charge will be
against both the ‘person’ requesting the visit, namely Forest Heath District Council, and the person or persons
acting on those instructions.
7. Would you please state why the attached letter was not signed.
8. There appears to be a factual error in your letter as it states “The law requires me to inform you …” while in fact
it is not the law but merely a statute or statutory instrument which requires this and neither of those are items
of law. Would you please clarify why your letter states that it is the law when in fact, it is not.
70