strawman

the Court ruling, I might well be in contempt of court were I to make a payment in opposition to their
finding.
4. Further, in my presence, it was stated by the Court that it appears likely that there is no such person as
the named defendant in this case. There is certainly no such person listed in the voters register and as
far as I am aware, there was no birth certificate produced in the name of the defendant in or around the
time when, I am told, I was born.
5. For the avoidance of doubt, let me make it clear that I am a human being with all of the God given
rights which that entails. I live under Common Law. I am not a member of any society, including the
society whose regulations Forest Heath District Council attempts to enforce. I do not consent to be
bound by those regulations and so no Acts of Parliament, statutes or statutory instruments apply to me.
I am not bound by them in any respect, and this fact has been accepted by Bury Magistrates Court.
6. Let me make it perfectly clear. The Named Defendant in this case does not reside at XXXXXXX,
Red Lodge and there is nothing belonging to the Named Defendant at that address. I, the human being
who has been confirmed not to be the Named Defendant, have ownership and full allodial title to all
property, goods and chattels at that address at the present time. Consequently, these items can hold no
interest whatsoever for you.
7. As you have been made aware of these facts, any attempt to harass me, the human being, or to impose
any form of charge on me, constitutes a fraudulent act, which if successful, becomes a matter of
criminal theft. Your ‘bailiff’ is directly liable for this theft and has no defence whatsoever by
claiming to be acting under your orders. You will no doubt be aware that when WWII German
officers claimed in their defence that they were “acting under orders”, they ended up being hanged.
The same applies to your employee, he would be guilty of theft and were that to occur, I intend to
press charges of theft against him personally, with the local police force - an offence under Section 2
of the Fraud Act 2006 and Section 12 of the Theft Act 1967, as well as pressing for his licence (if he
actually has one) to be cancelled by the certifying court. Please be aware that your company and it’s
directors would also be criminally liable for receiving the proceeds from any such theft and if you
wish, I will direct you to the relevant legislation.
I await, therefore, your immediate forwarding of the contract between myself and Rossendales Limited,
bearing the wet-ink signatures of both parties, and the Liability Order upon which you claim you rely.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,
Patrick-James
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Indefeasible Rights reserved.
The response, received on 24th January was:
98