strawman

We have been stating (as has Max) that Warrants, Court Orders, Liability Orders and the like
HAVE GOT TO BE SIGNED in ink!
As most of you saw Max was arrested Friday and appeared in Court Saturday.
This case was spectacular for TWO Reasons!
1. The Police Sergeant, On Record, In The Court explained how Devon & Cornwall Police
and Torquay Magistrates Court are owned and run by a US Subsidiary of IBM called
RELIANCE INC. - So .. proof positive that we are dealing with corporations!
2. (And this is the killer) When arrested Max protested that the "Warrant" that the Sergeant
"alleged" he had for Max's arrest was not signed and therefore wasn't lawful.
AND THE MAGISTRATES AGREED AND RELEASED MAX!
So we now have a precedent that we can quote where we can clearly state and prove that
warrants, liability orders and the like MUST BE SIGNED IN WET INK! A document with no
signature ... doesn't count.
Big congrats to Max for taking the stand and to Sarah Goldsmith who has kept us to date with
all this.
However, you will notice that the Liability Order copy issued by Bury St Edmunds Magistrates Court and
reproduced above, IS correctly signed in ink and not negated by the omission of a signature, so, while it
is useful to watch for any such omission, it is not going to be effective in every case and the omission can
be quickly remedied by another application to the court. A more powerful angle is the fact that a
Magistrates Court is not authorised to deal with matters of liability. But do not think that these
commercial companies (courts and police) which are all owned by the same non-British people, will act in
accordance with the law, or even bother with their own legal requirements.
The recent action taken with the arrest of the judge:
http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2011/03/08/roger-hayes-rise-like-lions-council-tax-lawful-rebellion-judge-arrested/
look like the only realistic way of dealing with the present unlawful and objectionable system.
There was then a response from the Norfolk Constabulary:
140