the Court ruling, I might well be in contempt of court were I to make a payment in opposition to theirfinding.4. Further, in my presence, it was stated by the Court that it appears likely that there is no such person asthe named defendant in this case. There is certainly no such person listed in the voters register and asfar as I am aware, there was no birth certificate produced in the name of the defendant in or around thetime when, I am told, I was born.5. For the avoidance of doubt, let me make it clear that I am a human being with all of the God givenrights which that entails. I live under Common Law. I am not a member of any society, including thesociety whose regulations Forest Heath District Council attempts to enforce. I do not consent to bebound by those regulations and so no Acts of Parliament, statutes or statutory instruments apply to me.I am not bound by them in any respect, and this fact has been accepted by Bury Magistrates Court.6. Let me make it perfectly clear. The Named Defendant in this case does not reside at XXXXXXX,Red Lodge and there is nothing belonging to the Named Defendant at that address. I, the human beingwho has been confirmed not to be the Named Defendant, have ownership and full allodial title to allproperty, goods and chattels at that address at the present time. Consequently, these items can hold nointerest whatsoever for you.7. As you have been made aware of these facts, any attempt to harass me, the human being, or to imposeany form of charge on me, constitutes a fraudulent act, which if successful, becomes a matter ofcriminal theft. Your ‘bailiff’ is directly liable for this theft and has no defence whatsoever byclaiming to be acting under your orders. You will no doubt be aware that when WWII Germanofficers claimed in their defence that they were “acting under orders”, they ended up being hanged.The same applies to your employee, he would be guilty of theft and were that to occur, I intend topress charges of theft against him personally, with the local police force - an offence under Section 2of the Fraud Act 2006 and Section 12 of the Theft Act 1967, as well as pressing for his licence (if heactually has one) to be cancelled by the certifying court. Please be aware that your company and it’sdirectors would also be criminally liable for receiving the proceeds from any such theft and if youwish, I will direct you to the relevant legislation.I await, therefore, your immediate forwarding of the contract between myself and Rossendales Limited,bearing the wet-ink signatures of both parties, and the Liability Order upon which you claim you rely.Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,Patrick-JamesWithout any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Indefeasible Rights reserved.The response, received on 24th January was:98
To which the response was:99
- Page 1 and 2:
Meet Your StrawmanThis is a picture
- Page 3 and 4:
not aware of these things, but by t
- Page 5 and 6:
persuade you to represent your stra
- Page 7 and 8:
They have a number of well-proven m
- Page 9 and 10:
You need to remember that any finan
- Page 11 and 12:
and what happened then was that the
- Page 13 and 14:
You might wonder why they would wan
- Page 15 and 16:
on the term of the mortgage contrac
- Page 17 and 18:
Dealing With The PoliceYears ago, a
- Page 19 and 20:
The change of ownership is shown by
- Page 21 and 22:
in the business of fooling people,
- Page 23 and 24:
remember, courts only deal with dis
- Page 25 and 26:
People who have been caught in this
- Page 27 and 28:
Isn't it great to be paying vast su
- Page 29 and 30:
Mr Banker is doing very well out of
- Page 31 and 32:
http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
- Page 33 and 34:
Testing the Application of the LawI
- Page 35 and 36:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 37 and 38:
37
- Page 39 and 40:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 41 and 42:
The response was:41
- Page 43 and 44:
Att. Ms L. Talbot,Forest Heath Dist
- Page 45 and 46:
45
- Page 47 and 48: You speak of disputes and suggest t
- Page 49 and 50: Next, drawing the attention of the
- Page 51 and 52: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 53 and 54: Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has l
- Page 55 and 56: Whereas it is my understanding that
- Page 57 and 58: (1) Exercise my “common law right
- Page 59 and 60: 59
- Page 61 and 62: Then to Forest Heath District Counc
- Page 63 and 64: Court hearing 18/11/10:I then atten
- Page 65 and 66: XXXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edm
- Page 67 and 68: 67
- Page 69 and 70: And this prompted the following rep
- Page 71 and 72: Yours faithfully,Patrick-James of t
- Page 73 and 74: 73
- Page 75 and 76: Please notice that this letter is t
- Page 77 and 78: incorrect as no Magistrates Court i
- Page 79 and 80: This is a very clear and well-prese
- Page 81 and 82: Anyway, may I again urge you to sto
- Page 83 and 84: 83
- Page 85 and 86: 85
- Page 87 and 88: 87
- Page 89 and 90: The first response was immediate an
- Page 91 and 92: Steven Oxborough,East Cambridgeshir
- Page 93 and 94: 4. The signatures of both parties.
- Page 95 and 96: Your Ref: 71146498STATEMENT OF ACCO
- Page 97: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
- Page 101 and 102: I state again that no debt is owed
- Page 103 and 104: 18th November 2010. I attended Bury
- Page 105 and 106: aware that I would charge you for m
- Page 107 and 108: 4. Proof that no employee or repres
- Page 109 and 110: XXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmun
- Page 111 and 112: Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYE
- Page 113 and 114: As a result of your continuing hara
- Page 115 and 116: A letter was then sent to the Chief
- Page 117 and 118: 117
- Page 119 and 120: Let me again state for the record,
- Page 121 and 122: This, of course, ignores everything
- Page 123 and 124: To which the response was:123
- Page 125 and 126: No response has been made to this a
- Page 127 and 128: To which the response was:In care o
- Page 129 and 130: them, estoppel has been established
- Page 131 and 132: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 133 and 134: 133
- Page 135 and 136: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 137 and 138: In spite of estoppel having been so
- Page 139 and 140: In care of:XXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
- Page 141 and 142: 141
- Page 143 and 144: To which the response was:XXXXXXXXX
- Page 145 and 146: TV Licence:Having recently become a
- Page 147 and 148: need your permission to watch telev
- Page 149 and 150:
149
- Page 151 and 152:
151
- Page 153 and 154:
153
- Page 155 and 156:
The inner “City of London” is a
- Page 157 and 158:
157
- Page 159 and 160:
159