strawman

British Constitution (including Magna Carta [1215], the Declaration and Bill of Rights [1688/89], Acts of
Union, Succession and Settlement [1701-07], the Coronation Oath Act [1689]).
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given
the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to
deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that for something to exist legally it must have a name, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognised as lawful in the United
Kingdom is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor
governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in the United Kingdom have a right to revoke or deny consent to
be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government
control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and that this factual
truth is expressed by way of example in the Theft Act 1968 and the Criminal Damage Act 1971, where
belief must be that the law creates and vests a specific right to act in that way. In English law, a limited
form of statutory offence is termed "claim of right". In Chamberlain v Lindon [1998] 1 WLR 1252 [1]
Lindon demolished a wall to protect a right-of-way, Despite allowing nine months to pass before acting,
Lindon honestly believed that it was immediately necessary to protect his legal rights without having to
resort to civil litigation. For the purposes of s5(2): it is not necessary to decide whether Lindon’s action
was justified as a matter of civil law. For the purpose of the criminal law, what matters is whether Lindon
believed that his actions were reasonable, i.e. a subjective test.
Thus a "lawful excuse" may be acknowledged by a court to arise when a person honestly, even if
mistakenly, believes that the actions are necessary and reasonable, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that if one has lawful excuse one may choose to not obey a court,
tribunal, statute, Act or order, and that this factual truth is expressed by way of example in the Theft Act
1968 and the Criminal Damage Act 1971 and,
Whereas it is my understanding that government does not clearly express that one may be charged for
failure to obey a de facto government or court, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that all existing courts and governments are de facto only and not de
jure, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that agreements made on behalf of the United Kingdom by traitors to
the United Kingdom do not bind the people of the United Kingdom, and,
Whereas I honourably refuse to be bound by agreements made by traitors, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any police officer who co-operates with foreign armed troops to
govern or regulate the population is also committing treason, and,
54