strawman
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Next, drawing the attention of the court to the current situation:
XXXXXXXXXXX,
Red Lodge,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
Near IP28 XXX
3rd November 2010
Att. Justices Chief Executive,
The Magistrates Court,
Shire Hall,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk
IP33 1HF
NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
Account number: 71146498
Summons number: 104259
Dear Sir,
I am in receipt of your communication dated 19th October 2010, attached herewith. As there is no such person as
“MR PATRICK KELLY” residing at XXXXXXXXXXX, Red Lodge, Suffolk, I am responding to your communication,
there being no other human being resident at that address.
I gather from your communication, that Forest Heath District Council has requested that you offer your services of
adjudication in a dispute between Forest Heath District Council and myself. In this instance, there is no dispute as
we are in full agreement and so your services will not be required on this occasion. I am attaching copies of the
relevant correspondence between Forest Heath District Council and myself in order that you may be fully
appraised of the current situation.
In brief outline, on 15th September 2010, Forest Heath District Council wrote requesting payment of an amount of
£370 which they describe as “Council Tax”. I wrote back assuring them that I would pay any lawful debt which I
might owe and requested that they provide evidence that there was a lawful debt outstanding against myself.
They have failed to do that in spite of repeated requests and adequate time being allowed and consequently, we
have now reached full tacit, legally binding agreement that there is no lawful debt of this nature outstanding
against me at this time. This places us in full agreement that there is no outstanding lawful debt against me at this
time, and since we are in full agreement, no adjudication is necessary in this matter.
Further, Forest Heath District Council has ignored my last two written communications, dated 16th October 2010
and 26th October 2010 respectively, placing them squarely in dishonour, which, if there were a dispute between
us, would lead to an automatic finding against themselves.
Would you please write to me confirming that your proposed adjudication set for 10:30 a.m. on 18th November
2010 is no longer assigned to this matter.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: ***_________________________________ *** (Agent)
Patrick: of the Kelly family
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
No assured value, No liability
49