The Council's point here being that since I had been fooled into paying the charge for the legal fictionentity MR PATRICK JAMES KELLY (due to the similarity of the names), that I, the human, had unwittinglyagreed to represent the legal fiction strawman and so was liable for all imaginary debts placed on thatfictitious entity. The response to that was:38
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmunds,SuffolkNear IP28 XXX4th October 2010Att. Lucy Talbot,Forest Heath District Council,District Office,College Heath Road,Mildenhall,SuffolkIP28 7EYYour Ref: 71146498Dear Lucy,I am today in receipt of your letter dated 1st October 2010. For the avoidance of doubt, let me clarify a number ofpoints.I find it most interesting that you suggest that a local court might offer to adjudicate in a dispute between us,considering that there is no dispute. I have already granted you conditional agreement to represent the fictional‘person’ MR PATRICK KELLY and pay any lawfully incurred debts, and consequently, there is no dispute betweenus and hence nothing on which to adjudicate.The copy documentation which you sent, demonstrates clearly that I am the human Patrick: Kelly while yourdemand for payment is to the legal fiction ‘MR PATRICK KELLY’. As you are aware, I have undertaken to payany amount lawfully owed by myself, the human being.You mention the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and you allege that(a) I am a person – which I most strongly deny, and(b) That I, the human being, am deemed liable under that Act.Let me draw your attention to the fact that statutes and statutory instruments only apply to human beings whoconsent to be bound by them, and I hereby state categorically, that I, the human being Patrick: Kelly, do notconsent to be bound by any such instruments.I grant you that the legal fiction ‘MR PATRICK KELLY’ which you seem to be confusing with myself, the humanbeing Patrick: Kelly, is indeed bound by those instruments. Further, I have agreed, within the time limit stated, torepresent that legal fiction provided that there is any lawful basis for my doing so.To that end, I have requested that you demonstrate that lawful basis by:1. Providing proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being. To date, this you have not done.2. Providing proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speakingand again, you have not yet provided this proof.3. Providing proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and 'lawful' and I am advised, that in yourposition, not knowing the difference would be considered gross negligence. At this time, you have not providedthis proof and the contents of your letter suggests that you are not aware of the difference.4. Providing proof of claim that I am a legal fiction 'person' MR PATRICK KELLY, being the entity to which youroriginal paperwork was addressed, and not Patrick: of the Kelly family, as commonly called. I have not yetreceived this proof from you.39
- Page 1 and 2: Meet Your StrawmanThis is a picture
- Page 3 and 4: not aware of these things, but by t
- Page 5 and 6: persuade you to represent your stra
- Page 7 and 8: They have a number of well-proven m
- Page 9 and 10: You need to remember that any finan
- Page 11 and 12: and what happened then was that the
- Page 13 and 14: You might wonder why they would wan
- Page 15 and 16: on the term of the mortgage contrac
- Page 17 and 18: Dealing With The PoliceYears ago, a
- Page 19 and 20: The change of ownership is shown by
- Page 21 and 22: in the business of fooling people,
- Page 23 and 24: remember, courts only deal with dis
- Page 25 and 26: People who have been caught in this
- Page 27 and 28: Isn't it great to be paying vast su
- Page 29 and 30: Mr Banker is doing very well out of
- Page 31 and 32: http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
- Page 33 and 34: Testing the Application of the LawI
- Page 35 and 36: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 37: 37
- Page 41 and 42: The response was:41
- Page 43 and 44: Att. Ms L. Talbot,Forest Heath Dist
- Page 45 and 46: 45
- Page 47 and 48: You speak of disputes and suggest t
- Page 49 and 50: Next, drawing the attention of the
- Page 51 and 52: XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 53 and 54: Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has l
- Page 55 and 56: Whereas it is my understanding that
- Page 57 and 58: (1) Exercise my “common law right
- Page 59 and 60: 59
- Page 61 and 62: Then to Forest Heath District Counc
- Page 63 and 64: Court hearing 18/11/10:I then atten
- Page 65 and 66: XXXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edm
- Page 67 and 68: 67
- Page 69 and 70: And this prompted the following rep
- Page 71 and 72: Yours faithfully,Patrick-James of t
- Page 73 and 74: 73
- Page 75 and 76: Please notice that this letter is t
- Page 77 and 78: incorrect as no Magistrates Court i
- Page 79 and 80: This is a very clear and well-prese
- Page 81 and 82: Anyway, may I again urge you to sto
- Page 83 and 84: 83
- Page 85 and 86: 85
- Page 87 and 88: 87
- Page 89 and 90:
The first response was immediate an
- Page 91 and 92:
Steven Oxborough,East Cambridgeshir
- Page 93 and 94:
4. The signatures of both parties.
- Page 95 and 96:
Your Ref: 71146498STATEMENT OF ACCO
- Page 97 and 98:
In care of:XXXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
- Page 99 and 100:
To which the response was:99
- Page 101 and 102:
I state again that no debt is owed
- Page 103 and 104:
18th November 2010. I attended Bury
- Page 105 and 106:
aware that I would charge you for m
- Page 107 and 108:
4. Proof that no employee or repres
- Page 109 and 110:
XXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmun
- Page 111 and 112:
Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYE
- Page 113 and 114:
As a result of your continuing hara
- Page 115 and 116:
A letter was then sent to the Chief
- Page 117 and 118:
117
- Page 119 and 120:
Let me again state for the record,
- Page 121 and 122:
This, of course, ignores everything
- Page 123 and 124:
To which the response was:123
- Page 125 and 126:
No response has been made to this a
- Page 127 and 128:
To which the response was:In care o
- Page 129 and 130:
them, estoppel has been established
- Page 131 and 132:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 133 and 134:
133
- Page 135 and 136:
XXXXXXXXXXXX,Red Lodge,Bury St Edmu
- Page 137 and 138:
In spite of estoppel having been so
- Page 139 and 140:
In care of:XXXXXXXXXXRed LodgeBury
- Page 141 and 142:
141
- Page 143 and 144:
To which the response was:XXXXXXXXX
- Page 145 and 146:
TV Licence:Having recently become a
- Page 147 and 148:
need your permission to watch telev
- Page 149 and 150:
149
- Page 151 and 152:
151
- Page 153 and 154:
153
- Page 155 and 156:
The inner “City of London” is a
- Page 157 and 158:
157
- Page 159 and 160:
159