BIOENERGY FOR EUROPE: WHICH ONES FIT BEST?

More documents

Recommendations

Info

178 7 Annex bundesamt (ed.): Kraus, K., Niklas, G., Tappe, M.: Aktuelle Bewertung des Einsatzes von Rapsöl/RME im Vergleich zu Dieselkraftstoff. UBA-Texte 97/99, Berlin, Germany 1999 SIAE 1998 / Swedish Institute of Agricultural Engineering: Short-Rotation Willow Coppice – Growers Manual. Uppsala, Sweden 1998 Udo de Haes 1996 / Udo de Haes, H. A.: Towards a Methodology of Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC-Europe). Brussels, Belgium 1996 Weidema 1999 / Weidema, B.(Institute for Product Development, Denmark): System expansions to handle co-products of renewable materials. In: 7 th LCA Case Studies Symposium, 2 December 1999, SETAC Europe. Brussels, Belgium 1999 Wenzel et al. 1997 / Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M., Alting, L.: Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol. 1: Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development. Chapman & Hall. London, United Kingdom 1997 (now Kluwer Academic Publishers) WMO 1995 / WMO (World Meteorological Organisation): Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1994. Report no. 37. Geneva, Italy 1995 Wolfensberger and Dinkel 1997 / Wolfensberger, U., Dinkel, F.: Beurteilung nachwachsender Rohstoffe in der Schweiz in den Jahren 1993 – 1996 [Assessment of Renewable Resources in Switzerland in the Years 1993 to 1996]. FAT (Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Agrarwirtschaft und Landtechnik). Tänikon, Switzerland 1997
Page 1 and 2:
BIOENERGY FOR EUROPE: WHICH ONES FI
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Executive summary.........
Page 5:
Contents III 5.3.2 Variation in col
Page 8 and 9:
2 Executive summary Table 1 Investi
Page 10 and 11:
4 Executive summary Result of the c
Page 12 and 13:
6 Executive summary Economic aspect
Page 15 and 16:
1 Goals, target groups and general
Page 17:
1 Goals, target groups and general
Page 20 and 21:
14 2 Biofuels under study The resul
Page 22 and 23:
16 2 Biofuels under study 2.3 Life
Page 24 and 25:
18 2 Biofuels under study 2.3.3 Mis
Page 26 and 27:
20 2 Biofuels under study 2.4.2 Sun
Page 28 and 29:
22 2 Biofuels under study 2.5 Life
Page 30 and 31:
24 2 Biofuels under study 2.5.3 Bio
Page 33 and 34:
3 Life cycle assessment of biofuels
Page 35 and 36:
3.2 Scope definition of the investi
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
3.3 Inventory analysis 35 then. Eve
Page 43 and 44:
3.3 Inventory analysis 37 using the
Page 45 and 46:
3.4 Impact assessment 39 energy cro
Page 47 and 48:
3.4 Impact assessment 41 The IPCC p
Page 49 and 50:
3.5 Interpretation 43 of the indivi
Page 51 and 52:
3.5 Interpretation 45 Fossil fuel p
Page 53 and 54:
4 Environmental results: presentati
Page 55 and 56:
4.1 Introduction 49 case excluding
Page 57 and 58:
4.2 European results: biofuels comp
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
4.3 European results: biofuels for
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
4.4 Summary of country specific res
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83:
4.5 Summary of comparisons between
Page 86 and 87:
80 5 Socio-economic and political a
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
90 6 Conclusions and recommendation
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 103 and 104:
7 Annex 7.1 Country specific life c
Page 105 and 106:
7.1 Country specific life cycle com
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134: 7.1 Country specific life cycle com
Page 165 and 166: 7.2 Comparisons between the countri
Page 175 and 176: 7.4 List of authors and addresses 1
Page 181 and 182: 7.5 Data availability 175 7.5 Data
Page 183: 7.6 Literature 177 Hauschild and We
show all

BIOENERGY FOR EUROPE: WHICH ONES FIT BEST?

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?