04.01.2013 Views

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

censorship that varied from region to region with no set standard, imposing<br />

most bans in the conservative West Country. Internationally, the film<br />

was banned in Ireland, Italy, and Norway, while France, Spain, and Belgium<br />

exhibited the film more or less without hindrance (Hewison, 79–92). One<br />

inevitable consequence of the outcry was the generation of priceless free<br />

publicity and heightened popular interest in the film, and box-office records<br />

were broken everywhere the film was shown.<br />

While Monty Python’s Life of Brian may fairly be described as aggressive<br />

in striking its comic targets, it is not blasphemous. The film’s humor is<br />

directed towards the human tendency to manipulate spiritual beliefs to<br />

fit personal exigencies, as Cleese says: “What is absurd is not the teachings<br />

of the founders of religion, it’s what followers subsequently make of it.<br />

And I was always astonished that people didn’t get that” (quoted in Cleese<br />

et al., 280). The Pythons carefully added scenes to the film that would<br />

separate Brian and Jesus into two distinct entities, so that it would be clear<br />

that it was the fictional Brian, and not the figure of Christ, who was being<br />

mocked (Hewison, 67). For example, the three wise men who visit the<br />

infant Brian and his Mum at the beginning of the film soon discover the<br />

right nativity a few stables away; at the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus<br />

himself (played by actor Ken Colley) appears and speaks his well-known<br />

words directly, though he is barely audible to the restless crowd; and most<br />

emphatically, Brian’s mother disabuses the followers of their mistaken<br />

notion: “There’s no Messiah in here . . . there’s a mess all right, but no<br />

Messiah!”<br />

Still, several specific scenes caused complaint among religious conservatives<br />

and were cited in legal and political challenges as particularly blasphemous,<br />

as they were judged to be in contradiction to what was considered<br />

biblical truth. For example, Christian groups believed the Gospel account<br />

of Jesus’ healing power was being mocked in the scenes where the cured<br />

leper is upset about losing his income after Jesus heals him, calling him a<br />

“Bloody Do-Gooder!” and when the followers pursue Brian, a blind man<br />

claims his sight is restored, then falls into a pit. Catholics were offended by<br />

the scene where one of the followers questions the virginity of Brian’s<br />

mother (“Is that a personal question?”), taking that to be an attack on the<br />

purity of the Virgin Mary. On the Street of Prophets, Brian’s attempt at<br />

messianic preaching mimics the actual words of Christ in the Gospels,<br />

with references to “lilies,” “birds” cared for by God, and the parable of the<br />

talents (Larsen, 149–50). Also troubling to the pious was Brian’s declaration<br />

to the pesky throng that “There’s no need to follow anyone,” and the<br />

final musical assertion that worrying is silly, since death is “the final word”;<br />

186 MONTY PYTHON’S LIFE OF BRIAN (1979)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!