04.01.2013 Views

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

obstacle to group ideals. Because they are constantly having meetings to<br />

draw up resolutions and exercise the democratic process, they are paralyzed<br />

to inactivity, while the conversations they have parody the growing political<br />

correctness of the 1970s and 1980s, with gender-pronoun precision<br />

and the inflated rhetoric of oppression (Solomon, 2001a, 302). Like the<br />

religious schisms between gourd- and sandal-followers, the terrorists separate<br />

into rival splinter groups, with each faction believing in their own<br />

righteousness and condemning the others, as one of the PFJ members<br />

proclaims: “The only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking<br />

Judaean People’s Front!” The raid on Pilate’s palace is a failure due to the<br />

groups’ petty infighting and consequent lack of cohesion needed to fight<br />

the common enemy, that is, the government of <strong>Rome</strong>; because of their<br />

mutual antagonism, the rebel groups fail to see the big picture. The film<br />

presents the disarray and confusion among the several anti-Roman factions<br />

as a sharp commentary on the alienation of modern society into<br />

separate self-interested groups, and the loss of power when individuals<br />

commit themselves to group ideologies. When Brian’s followers “swarm”<br />

around his house, Mum scolds and Brian lectures the crowd about their<br />

unthinking conformity and group mentality, and as they agree that they<br />

are separate people, “Yes, we are all individuals,” they reply in ironic<br />

unison. In a post-9/11 world, and in light of more recent definitions of<br />

terrorism, the “terrorist” organizations in the film appear benign and harmless<br />

in their comic impotence.<br />

While Life of Brian mocks the rebels, the authorities are eviscerated with<br />

even greater finesse. The playful attack on “the powers that be” was always<br />

an integral part of Python comedy, as a celebration of individual freedom<br />

of the 1960s and 1970s, but now they were responding to the hardening of<br />

authoritative structures at the dawning of the 1980s. “It gave us a way to<br />

do a film about authority, about the British establishment as much as the<br />

Jewish or Roman establishment of the time. So nearly everything that we<br />

wrote in it seemed to be relevant and to be about something, and that was<br />

consciously important” (Palin, in Cleese et al., 306). Authority is ridiculed<br />

everywhere in the film, shown to be disengaged, out of touch, and ineffectual.<br />

The Roman guards react with boredom and indifference when they<br />

witness scuffles among the Jews and other groups at the Sermon on the<br />

Mount and the stoning of Matthias. Even when they are roused to action,<br />

entire legions are comically incapable of finding Brian in the cramped PFJ<br />

headquarters, and they allow him to escape when they fall on the floor,<br />

crippled with laughter upon hearing Pilate utter the name of a Roman<br />

aristocrat: “Anyone else feel like a little giggle when I mention my friend,<br />

190 MONTY PYTHON’S LIFE OF BRIAN (1979)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!