07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Luigi Calamari presents Poster 40 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />

Session theme 5: Development and improvement <strong>of</strong> welfare assessment protocols<br />

112<br />

Poster 40<br />

IMPROVEMENT OF ANIMAL WELFARE IN DAIRY FARMS USING A<br />

MODEL TO HIGHLIGHT THE MAIN CRITICAL POINTS<br />

L. Calamari 1 , S. Caré, R. Lombardelli<br />

1 Istituto di Zootecnica, Facoltà di Agraria, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy<br />

Many methods to assess animal welfare in dairy farms were developed in the last few years. Some<br />

methods include, as goals, the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> welfare problems and provision <strong>of</strong> advice to the farmers.<br />

The aim was to use our model <strong>of</strong> welfare assessment to improve animal welfare in dairy farms, and<br />

to evaluate the response using the model in comparison to the basal plasma cortisol indicator. Our<br />

model was used in two farms (A and B, 200 lactating cows each) with 3 series <strong>of</strong> visits during a<br />

year per each farm. It considers indirect and direct indicators, included in three clusters<br />

(environment, feeding and animal response), and calculates a standardized (0-100 scale) overall<br />

welfare score (OW). For cortisol evaluation, blood samples were collected in each visit from 10<br />

lactating cows (30-120 days in milk) using standardized procedure to avoid stress at sampling. The<br />

data obtained with our model were analyzed and some advices were formulated. Substantial<br />

refinements <strong>of</strong> stalls (neck rail height and floor comfort), diets and milking management were<br />

suggested in farm B.<br />

The OW in the first visit was greater in farm A (71.2) than B (68.2), together with lower level <strong>of</strong><br />

plasma cortisol (4.3±2.3 in A and 12.8±7.6 ng/ml in B). Only slight increase in OW was observed<br />

in A (71.6 and 72.3 in the 2 nd and 3 rd visit respectively). In B a greater increase <strong>of</strong> OW was<br />

observed (72.0 and 77.1 in the 2 nd and 3 rd visit respectively), not only as consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

increased score <strong>of</strong> indirect indicators but also as greater score <strong>of</strong> some direct indicators (<strong>be</strong>tter<br />

animal response). In this farm the cortisol decreased in the 2 nd visit (7.5±4.1 ng/ml), but later<br />

increased (11.1±6.8 ng/ml).<br />

In conclusion the proposed model seems promising to highlight some critical points in order to<br />

improve animal welfare.<br />

Contact information: Luigi Calamari or email luigi.calamari@unicatt.it<br />

Complete address: Istituto di Zootecnica Facoltà di Agraria Via Emilia Parmense, 84 29100<br />

Piacenza<br />

Species: Dairy cattle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!