07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pete Goddard presents Workshop paper 6<br />

In workshop 3: Do extensive production systems provide high animal welfare?<br />

Friday, 12 Septem<strong>be</strong>r 2008 from 14h00-15h45 in the Het Pand chaired by Pete Goddard<br />

181<br />

Workshop paper 6<br />

DO EXTENSIVE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS PROVIDE HIGH WELFARE<br />

FOR THE ANIMALS IN THOSE SYSTEMS? SETTING THE SCENE<br />

P. Goddard 1 , C. Dwyer 2<br />

1 Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, A<strong>be</strong>rdeen, UK<br />

2 Scottish Agricultural College, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK<br />

The freedom <strong>of</strong> extensively-managed animals to express more <strong>of</strong> their <strong>be</strong>havioural repertoire than<br />

animals within intensive systems has generated the assumption that animals in extensive systems<br />

enjoy high welfare status. Yet extensively-managed animals may experience a num<strong>be</strong>r <strong>of</strong><br />

challenges: prolonged periods when food and water are scarce; climatic extremes; untreated disease<br />

or injury; and possibly high levels <strong>of</strong> fear and stress, during handling. In providing good welfare,<br />

the farmer in extensive systems faces additional challenges: e.g. access to land to inspect animals.<br />

Decisions about whether to gather all the animals to treat a small num<strong>be</strong>r at welfare risk is a<br />

significant farming decision with high costs to the farmer, and welfare risk to other animals that are<br />

gathered and handled. Stock inspection can differ in extensive systems; welfare standards are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

vague in terms <strong>of</strong> requirements and recognised good practice. Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs must <strong>be</strong> made by the<br />

farmer, depending on his personal, animal welfare and economic goals, and these may differ from<br />

the genuine welfare needs <strong>of</strong> the animal.<br />

This workshop will challenge different stakeholder perspectives on the welfare <strong>of</strong> animals in<br />

extensive systems since it is clear that all players, but primarily the consumer, the farmer and the<br />

welfare assessor or lobbyist, might hold differing views on the welfare <strong>of</strong> animals kept under<br />

extensive conditions.<br />

Consumers may <strong>be</strong> reluctant to pay more for welfare <strong>be</strong>nefits in a system that they already <strong>be</strong>lieve<br />

provides good welfare. This could act as a constraint that might prevent farmers from achieving<br />

welfare objectives, as the expressed consumer <strong>be</strong>haviour would not reward these efforts.<br />

Reaching a consensus view on the current welfare state <strong>of</strong> animals in extensive systems will help to<br />

<strong>be</strong>nchmark and assess whether and by what means animal welfare in these systems can <strong>be</strong><br />

improved.<br />

Contact information: Pete Goddard or email p.goddard@macaulay.ac.uk<br />

Complete address: Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, A<strong>be</strong>rdeen, AB15 8QH, UK<br />

Species: General

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!