07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Charlotte Hallén Sandgren presents Oral paper 6<br />

In session 1: Development, validation and automated measurements <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> animal welfare<br />

Thursday, 11 Septem<strong>be</strong>r 2008 from 12h15-12h30 in the Aula chaired by Isa<strong>be</strong>lle Veissier<br />

34<br />

Oral paper 6<br />

CAN CATTLE WELFARE BE ASSESSED USING A PRE-COLLECTED<br />

REGISTER DATA?<br />

A. Lind<strong>be</strong>rg 1 , C.H. Sandgren 1 , L. Keeling 2<br />

1 Swedish Dairy Association, Kalmar, Sweden<br />

2 Swedish University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Environment and Health, Uppsala,<br />

Sweden<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate if herds <strong>be</strong>ing at risk <strong>of</strong> a ”welfare deficiency” could <strong>be</strong><br />

identified via pre-collected data on production, fertility, disease/health and culling.<br />

In 55 randomly selected dairy herds, animal-based measurements <strong>of</strong> cleanliness, body condition (in<br />

cows, calves and young stock), injuries, lameness and rising <strong>be</strong>haviour (in cows only) were<br />

recorded. A herd was a case <strong>of</strong> ”welfare deficiency” if it had a score among the 10% worst on ≥2 <strong>of</strong><br />

these measurements.<br />

Sixty-six potential welfare indicators were identified from the register data and reduced by<br />

multivariable methods to identify indicators with a significant effect on one or more <strong>of</strong> the animalbased<br />

measurements. The performance <strong>of</strong> each indicator in classifying case herds was evaluated at<br />

three cut-<strong>of</strong>fs corresponding to its 80th, 90th and 95th percentile. At each cut-<strong>of</strong>f the minimum set<br />

<strong>of</strong> indicators that could identify most case herds was identified (optimising sensitivity).<br />

In a second step, the same procedure was performed on these selected minimum sets, while<br />

optimising on specificity. The resulting model contained three different fertility parameters as well<br />

as calf mortality, and correctly classified 85% <strong>of</strong> the herds. Sensitivity was 69%. For credibility<br />

reasons, cow and young stock mortality were added. The final model, comprising three different<br />

fertility parameters and three different mortality parameters, correctly classified 85% <strong>of</strong> the herds<br />

with 85% sensitivity.<br />

The results indicate that fertility and early mortality data provide valuable information about<br />

welfare by their broad ability to reflect stockmanship and management in the dairy herd. We<br />

<strong>be</strong>lieve that consistently high mortality rates and/or poor fertility may <strong>be</strong> an indication <strong>of</strong> failure in<br />

monitoring and/or acting on signals <strong>of</strong> animal performance.<br />

Contact information: Ann Lind<strong>be</strong>rg or email charlotte.sandgren@svdhv.org<br />

Complete address: Swedish Dairy Association, P.O. Box 932, SE-391 29 Kalmar, Sweden<br />

Species: Dairy cattle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!