Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Deborah Temple presents Poster 52 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />
Session theme 5: Development and improvement <strong>of</strong> welfare assessment protocols<br />
124<br />
Poster 52<br />
DEVELOPING A WELFARE ASSESSMENT TOOL WITHIN THE<br />
WELFARE QUALITY® PROJECT: THE CASE OF WEANERS AND<br />
GROWING PIGS<br />
D. Temple 1 , A. Dalmau 1 , V. Courboulay 2 , M.C. Meunier-Salaün 3 , A. Velarde 1<br />
1 IRTA, Finca Camps i armet s/n, Monells(17121), Girona, Spain<br />
2 IFIP, Institut du porc, BP 35104, 35651 Le Rheu cedex, France<br />
3 INRA, UMR SENAH, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint Gilles, France<br />
An on-farm welfare assessment protocol was developed for weaners and growing pigs according to<br />
the 4 animal welfare principles <strong>of</strong> the Welfare Quality® project. Eleven criteria related to good<br />
feeding, good resting, good health and appropriate <strong>be</strong>haviour were defined and appropriate<br />
measures elaborated.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the criteria were assessed with animal-based measures, except absence <strong>of</strong> prolonged thirst<br />
and ease <strong>of</strong> movement, that were environmental-based. The validity and repeatability <strong>be</strong>tween<br />
observers <strong>of</strong> the measures were previously assessed.<br />
Most measures were scored at pen/group level according to a three-point scale ranging from 0<br />
(good welfare) to 2 (poor or unacceptable). According to the measure, pen score were established<br />
directly (scouring, fear <strong>of</strong> humans) or took into account the proportion <strong>of</strong> pigs with scores 0, 1 and<br />
2. Considering the lack <strong>of</strong> on-farm reference in some measures (<strong>be</strong>haviour, environmental<br />
measurements), those are expressed as a sum <strong>of</strong> occurrence (<strong>be</strong>haviour, qualitative assessment) or<br />
as a description (environment).<br />
The welfare assessment protocol was carried out by one trained assessor on an average <strong>of</strong> 150 pigs<br />
per farm, housed in 10 different pens/groups. Sixty farms, from extensive to intensive layout,<br />
located in Spain and France were visited to assess the validity <strong>of</strong> the protocol. Around 8000 pigs<br />
were directly assessed with the protocol for health measures, 9000 for qualitative <strong>be</strong>haviour<br />
assessment, coughing and sneezing and 9000 for social and exploratory <strong>be</strong>haviour (from a total <strong>of</strong><br />
130 000 present in the farms). The visit <strong>of</strong> the farm lasted around six-eight hours.<br />
This poster presents the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> this survey and the range <strong>of</strong> the different measures,<br />
which may help in ¿proposing/amending? the scoring system and simplify the protocol.<br />
Contact information: Deborah Temple or email antonio.velarde@irta.es<br />
Complete address: Finca Camps i Armet s/n 17121, Monells, Girona, SPAIN<br />
Species: Pig