07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Deborah Temple presents Poster 52 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />

Session theme 5: Development and improvement <strong>of</strong> welfare assessment protocols<br />

124<br />

Poster 52<br />

DEVELOPING A WELFARE ASSESSMENT TOOL WITHIN THE<br />

WELFARE QUALITY® PROJECT: THE CASE OF WEANERS AND<br />

GROWING PIGS<br />

D. Temple 1 , A. Dalmau 1 , V. Courboulay 2 , M.C. Meunier-Salaün 3 , A. Velarde 1<br />

1 IRTA, Finca Camps i armet s/n, Monells(17121), Girona, Spain<br />

2 IFIP, Institut du porc, BP 35104, 35651 Le Rheu cedex, France<br />

3 INRA, UMR SENAH, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint Gilles, France<br />

An on-farm welfare assessment protocol was developed for weaners and growing pigs according to<br />

the 4 animal welfare principles <strong>of</strong> the Welfare Quality® project. Eleven criteria related to good<br />

feeding, good resting, good health and appropriate <strong>be</strong>haviour were defined and appropriate<br />

measures elaborated.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the criteria were assessed with animal-based measures, except absence <strong>of</strong> prolonged thirst<br />

and ease <strong>of</strong> movement, that were environmental-based. The validity and repeatability <strong>be</strong>tween<br />

observers <strong>of</strong> the measures were previously assessed.<br />

Most measures were scored at pen/group level according to a three-point scale ranging from 0<br />

(good welfare) to 2 (poor or unacceptable). According to the measure, pen score were established<br />

directly (scouring, fear <strong>of</strong> humans) or took into account the proportion <strong>of</strong> pigs with scores 0, 1 and<br />

2. Considering the lack <strong>of</strong> on-farm reference in some measures (<strong>be</strong>haviour, environmental<br />

measurements), those are expressed as a sum <strong>of</strong> occurrence (<strong>be</strong>haviour, qualitative assessment) or<br />

as a description (environment).<br />

The welfare assessment protocol was carried out by one trained assessor on an average <strong>of</strong> 150 pigs<br />

per farm, housed in 10 different pens/groups. Sixty farms, from extensive to intensive layout,<br />

located in Spain and France were visited to assess the validity <strong>of</strong> the protocol. Around 8000 pigs<br />

were directly assessed with the protocol for health measures, 9000 for qualitative <strong>be</strong>haviour<br />

assessment, coughing and sneezing and 9000 for social and exploratory <strong>be</strong>haviour (from a total <strong>of</strong><br />

130 000 present in the farms). The visit <strong>of</strong> the farm lasted around six-eight hours.<br />

This poster presents the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> this survey and the range <strong>of</strong> the different measures,<br />

which may help in ¿proposing/amending? the scoring system and simplify the protocol.<br />

Contact information: Deborah Temple or email antonio.velarde@irta.es<br />

Complete address: Finca Camps i Armet s/n 17121, Monells, Girona, SPAIN<br />

Species: Pig

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!