Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
José Wavreille presents Poster 81 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />
Session theme 6: Free topics<br />
EFFECTS OF TWO-STAGE WEANING ON CALF BEHAVIOUR<br />
J. Wavreille 1 , P. Pochet 2 , E. Winance 2 , D. Cloet 1 , N. Bartiaux-Thill 1<br />
153<br />
Poster 81<br />
1 Animal production and Nutrition Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium<br />
2 General Direction <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Walloon Region Ministry <strong>of</strong> Belgium, Libramont, Belgium<br />
Among suckling cattle, the calf and its mother vocalize repeatedly in the three to four days<br />
following weaning. On the calf’s part, lowing shows a state <strong>of</strong> stress and indicates distress due to<br />
the sudden cessation <strong>of</strong> suckling and contact with its mother. The aim <strong>of</strong> two-stage weaning is to<br />
sever the bond <strong>be</strong>tween cow and calf without causing stress to the calf. The method involves<br />
attaching an anti-sucking device (nose-flap) to the calf’s nose (stage 1) for four to seven days <strong>be</strong>fore<br />
the physical separation from the mother (stage 2). The calves learn to stop suckling while remaining<br />
in contact with the mother.<br />
The <strong>be</strong>haviour <strong>of</strong> 2 x 5 calves aged about 6 months was compared in two-stage versus conventional<br />
weaning, using pedometers and in situ observations <strong>of</strong> the calves <strong>be</strong>fore and after separation,<br />
respectively during 7 days in pasture and 3 days in livestock buildings. The <strong>be</strong>haviour was observed<br />
1 hour in the morning and afternoon (1 observation every 3 minutes). The data were analysed<br />
according to a single fixed factor analysis <strong>of</strong> variance using Minitab’s GLM procedure 13.31.<br />
The nose-flap was not wholly effective: some successful attempts <strong>of</strong> suckling were observed. The<br />
calves fitted with a nose-flap spent significantly less time grazing (9% <strong>of</strong> the time compared with<br />
18%; p