07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Andrew Butterworth presents Poster 85 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />

Session theme 7: Stakeholders' views on animal welfare<br />

157<br />

Poster 85<br />

CREATING THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS FOR A ‘MARKET LINKED’<br />

ANIMAL WELFARE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM.<br />

A. Butterworth 1 , L.J. Keeling 2 , I. Veissier 3 , M. Miele 4 , H.J. Blokhuis 2<br />

1<br />

Clinical Veterinary Science, University <strong>of</strong> Bristol, Langford, N Somerset, BS40 5DU, UK<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala,<br />

Sweden<br />

3<br />

INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Site de Theix, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France<br />

4<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Cardiff, School <strong>of</strong> City and Regional Planning, Cardiff, UK<br />

This paper descri<strong>be</strong>s how WelfareQuality® (WQ), in collaboration with a commercial<br />

normalization company, has <strong>be</strong>en creating an animal welfare assessment system for ‘market linked’<br />

use, addressing the key areas <strong>of</strong> feeding, housing, health and appropriate <strong>be</strong>haviour for pigs, poultry<br />

and cattle, on farm and at slaughter, arranged as 4 principles (and 12 criteria). The technical<br />

documents for this system have the following structure;<br />

A general document which outlines the background to the WQ measures and a ‘scope’ document<br />

which descri<strong>be</strong>s the intended uses and areas where the techniques cannot <strong>be</strong> used.<br />

‘Terms and definitions’ – descriptions which assist the user (both assessor and producer) to <strong>be</strong> clear<br />

about what is <strong>be</strong>ing assessed.<br />

The ‘basic principles’ underlying the assessment methods and a description <strong>of</strong> the techniques used<br />

for each assessed measure for each species.<br />

A document also descri<strong>be</strong>s the overall process leading to creation <strong>of</strong> reports and scores, and an<br />

annex containing a questionnaire on farm information which can <strong>be</strong> used to provide management<br />

support to the producer, along with links to training, reference and background material (for<br />

example photographic scales <strong>of</strong> hygiene scores, lesion scores or video <strong>of</strong> lame animals).<br />

The technical documents can <strong>be</strong> updated to enable changes, improvements and new knowledge to<br />

<strong>be</strong> incorporated.<br />

The paper concludes with discussion on the potential for ‘harmonised protocols’ to give increased<br />

confidence, through use <strong>of</strong> a structure in line with agreed standards for assessment systems (such as<br />

EN45011) to help to ensure that both the assessed and the assessor are aware <strong>of</strong> what will <strong>be</strong><br />

covered during a farm inspection.<br />

Additionally, the potential for producers to use this information to enable them to use their skills<br />

and innovation to make positive changes is discussed.<br />

Contact information: Andrew Butterworth or email andy.butterworth@bris.ac.uk<br />

Complete address: University <strong>of</strong> Bristol, Clinical Veterinary Science, Langford, N Somerset, BS40<br />

5DU, UK<br />

Species: General

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!