Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Elsa Vasseur presents Poster 50 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />
Session theme 5: Development and improvement <strong>of</strong> welfare assessment protocols<br />
122<br />
Poster 50<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERVENTION STRATEGY TO IMPROVE<br />
WELFARE OF REPLACEMENT ANIMALS IN CANADIAN DAIRY FARMS<br />
E. Vasseur 1 , J. Rushen 2 , D. Pellerin 1 , D. Lefebvre 3 , A.M. de Passillé 1<br />
1 Laval University, Que<strong>be</strong>c, Canada<br />
2 AAFC, British Columbia, Canada<br />
3 Valacta, Que<strong>be</strong>c, Canada<br />
The welfare <strong>of</strong> dairy calves is <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked. In an intervention strategy to improve calf welfare,<br />
we surveyed management practices on 115 farms in Que<strong>be</strong>c. We collected management- and<br />
animal-based data through visits, interviews and a questionnaire. Height critical points and<br />
associated welfare problems were identified : 1) Around calving: 51% <strong>of</strong> producers used tie stall as<br />
main calving area; 2) First care to newborn: 37% <strong>of</strong> producers never disinfected calf’s navel; 3)<br />
Colostrum management: producers gave only minimum recommended quantity (3.0L within 12h);<br />
4) Cow-calf separation: 68% <strong>of</strong> producers let cow and calf together for more than 2h; 5) Milk<br />
feeding: 34% <strong>of</strong> producers gave non pasteurised waste milk; 6) Weaning: 12% <strong>of</strong> producers used<br />
abrupt weaning; 7) Calf housing: only 12% <strong>of</strong> producers used group housing; 8) Health: average<br />
mortality at birth was 8.8%.<br />
We studied producers’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> and attitudes to calf rearing and found some relationships that<br />
explain a low interest in calf welfare: 50% <strong>of</strong> producers under-estimated rearing costs by 20%, calf<br />
mortality was under-estimated by 20-50%, 94% <strong>of</strong> farmers perceived that calf mortality as not a<br />
problem, and 50% <strong>of</strong> producers had no specialised degree in agriculture.<br />
We then developed a scoring tool based on the critical points identified in our epidemiological<br />
survey and we added two other points: 9)Post-weaning feeding and 10)housing. We tested our tool<br />
in 25 farms for feasibility and repeatability <strong>be</strong>tween two observers. In addition, colostrum samples<br />
were collected and the quality <strong>of</strong> colostrum was checked. Blood samples were collected and tested<br />
to check passive transfer <strong>of</strong> immunity. Mortality and morbidity were recorded during a six-month<br />
period. An interview with the farmer was conducted as a debriefing on the implementation <strong>of</strong> our<br />
on-farm welfare tool.<br />
Identifying critical points and producers’ perceptions and attitudes are essential steps to construct a<br />
tool adapted to our population.<br />
Contact information: Elsa Vasseur or email elsa.vasseur.1@ulaval.ca<br />
Complete address: Pavillon Paul Comtois, 4131 Dpt Sciences Animales, Qué<strong>be</strong>c (QC) G1K 7P4,<br />
Canada<br />
Species: Dairy cattle