Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ines Windschnurer presents Oral paper 10<br />
In session 2: Assessing emotional state and human-animal relations<br />
Thursday, 11 Septem<strong>be</strong>r 2008 from 15h15-15h30 in the Aula chaired by Susanne Waiblinger<br />
38<br />
Oral paper 10<br />
CAN STROKING DURING MILKING DECREASE AVOIDANCE<br />
DISTANCES OF COWS TOWARDS HUMANS?<br />
I. Windschnurer 1 , K. Barth 2 , S. Waiblinger 1<br />
1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Animal Husbandry and Welfare, University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria<br />
2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Organic Farming, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural<br />
Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Trenthorst, Germany<br />
We tested if short-time stroking in daily farm routine could improve the cow-human relationship<br />
and consequently decrease avoidance distances, and whether this effect lasted at least one month.<br />
32 cows were allocated to a treatment=STROKING or CONTROL group (balanced according to<br />
age, calving, breed). STROKING: Over a 5-day period (treatment1), each animal was stroked<br />
during morning and evening milking by an unfamiliar person (experimenter) for 3 min. Treatment2<br />
(3.5-day period) was performed 4 weeks later. One cow was excluded from STROKING due to<br />
aggressive <strong>be</strong>haviour. CONTROL: animals could observe the experimenter during milking. Before<br />
and after treatment, the experimenter recorded avoidance distances <strong>of</strong> cows (distance <strong>of</strong> first<br />
withdrawal when approached frontally) at the feeding place (AVOIDfeed) and in the barn<br />
(AVOIDbarn). Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis.<br />
Before treatment1, CONTROL- and STROKING-animals did not differ in AVOIDbarn (Z=–1.57,<br />
p>0.05) or AVOIDfeed (Z=–0.78, p>0.05).<br />
AVOIDbarn <strong>of</strong> STROKING-animals decreased (Z=–2.01, p