07.01.2013 Views

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

Acknowledgements Book of abstracts - Publicaties - Vlaanderen.be

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nicole Bartiaux-Thill presents Poster 84 during the poster sessions in the Aula.<br />

Session theme 7: Stakeholders' views on animal welfare<br />

156<br />

Poster 84<br />

DIFFERENT CONCEPTS OF ANIMAL WELFARE AND STAKEHOLDERS’<br />

ARGUMENTS<br />

N. Bartiaux-Thill 1 , P. Stassart 2 , C.l. Lamine 3 , J. Wavreille 1 , Y. Beckers 4 , A. Théwis 4<br />

1<br />

Centre Wallon de Recherches agronomiques, Département Productions et Nutrition animales, Gembloux,<br />

Belgium<br />

2<br />

Département des Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement, Université de Liège, Arlon, Belgium<br />

3<br />

Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France<br />

4<br />

Faculté universitaire des Sciences agronomiques de Gembloux, Unité de Zootechnie, Gembloux, Belgium<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the study is to explore the issue <strong>of</strong> animal welfare in an attempt to go <strong>be</strong>yond the<br />

standard, very sectorial treatment and take account <strong>of</strong> the different stakeholders’ views.<br />

Methodology consists <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive survey based on individual interviews with players<br />

concerned, whether acting in an <strong>of</strong>ficial capacity (animal welfare bodies, consumer associations,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional agricultural organisations, institutional players, welfare council, etc.) or stakeholders<br />

actively involved in the issue (farmers and consumers).<br />

As was to <strong>be</strong> expected, definitions <strong>of</strong> animal welfare vary greatly <strong>be</strong>tween the players involved.<br />

They fall into two opposing categories: according to the first, animal welfare can <strong>be</strong> objectivized;<br />

according to the second, it is a philosophical and ethical question that cannot <strong>be</strong> objectivized. A<br />

third, midway position considers it a matter <strong>of</strong> acceptability. In the face <strong>of</strong> all these concepts,<br />

animal welfare ought to <strong>be</strong> regarded as a political issue, in the wider sense, which should lead to a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> standards and knowledge, again in the wider sense.<br />

Different arguments are put forward by the various stakeholders.<br />

Where consumers are concerned we note that their arguments intersect with those <strong>of</strong> other<br />

stakeholders. On the one hand, they share questions with animal welfare bodies about the future <strong>of</strong><br />

the agricultural system and its link with the environment and, on the other hand, they are concerned,<br />

along with producers and middlemen, about the cost <strong>of</strong> animal welfare measures and about meat<br />

quality.<br />

The comprehensive survey and exploration <strong>of</strong> the animal welfare arguments are a preliminary step<br />

that will pave the way for subsequent participation in a joint initiative by all the stakeholders.<br />

Contact information: Nicole Bartiaux-Thill or email bartiaux@cra.wallonie.<strong>be</strong><br />

Complete address: 8, rue de Liroux, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium<br />

Species: General

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!