10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Women and Literacy<br />

137<br />

While the ability to read and write is the key to <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t, precise estimates as to who could read and write <strong>in</strong> eighteenth-century<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia rema<strong>in</strong> elusive. As noted previously here, much confusion exists as to what<br />

makes a person literate—the separate skills <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g and writ<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

<strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed—and there are severe problems with estimat<strong>in</strong>g any type <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

literacy. Women are probably underrepresented <strong>in</strong> literacy estimates and it is now<br />

generally accepted that more early American women could read than earlier studies<br />

suggest. 11 Few artifacts rema<strong>in</strong> to help determ<strong>in</strong>e who could read. <strong>The</strong> common<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g the ability to sign one’s name, usually <strong>in</strong> wills and court<br />

documents, misses many women <strong>in</strong> colonial British America who were taught only<br />

to read and never taught the more technical details <strong>of</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g with a quill pen. As<br />

Kerrison noted, most girls were not taught to cut a pen from bird feathers, as were<br />

the boys, as such use <strong>of</strong> a penknife was not considered very fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e. 12 It is likely<br />

that many who signed with only a mark could read. As women were <strong>of</strong>ten left out<br />

<strong>of</strong> such legal processes, they may be vastly underrepresented <strong>in</strong> such analysis <strong>of</strong> legal<br />

documents. Read<strong>in</strong>g literacy was likely to be much higher than writ<strong>in</strong>g literacy,<br />

especially for women. As David D. Hall suggested, even <strong>in</strong> seventeenth-century<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, women participated <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g, but literacy <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Chesapeake was relative to the specific environment: “Literacy was thus a two-sided<br />

situation, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> skills but also open-ended <strong>in</strong> ways that sharply<br />

reduced the significance <strong>of</strong> gender and class.” 13<br />

ix.<br />

11 For example, see Warner, Letters <strong>of</strong> the Republic, 14 or Hayes, Colonial Woman’s Bookshelf,<br />

12 Kerrison, Claim<strong>in</strong>g the Pen, 15.<br />

13 Richard Brown, Knowledge is Power: <strong>The</strong> Diffusion <strong>of</strong> Information <strong>in</strong> Early America, 1700-<br />

1865, (New York: Oxford University <strong>Press</strong>, 1989), 12. J. Paul Hunter, Before Novels: <strong>The</strong> Cultural<br />

Context <strong>of</strong> Eighteenth-Century English Fiction (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990), 65-85, and<br />

Jennifer Monaghan, Learn<strong>in</strong>g to Read and Write <strong>in</strong> Colonial America (Amherst: University <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!