10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214<br />

has ever been Established <strong>in</strong> this Prov<strong>in</strong>ce.” While that writer is unknown, his<br />

comment does demonstrate the hope <strong>of</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia residents <strong>of</strong> 1766 to have a better-<br />

run newspaper that could be freer to publish criticism <strong>of</strong> the government. R<strong>in</strong>d<br />

claimed that his newspaper would be, “Open to all parties, but <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

none.” 47<br />

<strong>The</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Gazette was quick to jo<strong>in</strong> the competitive fray,<br />

match<strong>in</strong>g the new competitor’s moves and ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for itself a reputation as a “free<br />

press.” Now published by Alexander Purdie, who was soon jo<strong>in</strong>ed by John Dixon,<br />

they quickly matched the lower price, and announced a new, open press policy<br />

before R<strong>in</strong>d’s newspaper even came out: “my press shall be as free as any Gentleman<br />

can wish or desire; that is, as free as any publick press upon the cont<strong>in</strong>ent.” 48 Just a<br />

few months later, two writers argu<strong>in</strong>g oppos<strong>in</strong>g sides <strong>of</strong> an issue did agree on one<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> press run by Purdie and Dixon was now well run: such freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

press “is [a] matter <strong>of</strong> rejoic<strong>in</strong>g,” and “You, Sir, have behaved yourself as the<br />

director <strong>of</strong> a press ought to do.” However, these writers’ praise was for both<br />

presses. 49 A notice <strong>in</strong> Purdie’s paper acknowledged that only with real competition,<br />

only with at least two newspapers, could a free flow <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation be susta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

With the loss <strong>of</strong> the government subsidy, Purdie was <strong>in</strong> danger <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g forced out<br />

<strong>of</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, and he pleaded with the “friends <strong>of</strong> liberty” to help keep his newspaper<br />

and pr<strong>in</strong>t shop <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess; “we have reason to believe it the almost universal desire<br />

that there should be two presses ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, for the security <strong>of</strong> freedom to one or<br />

47 R<strong>in</strong>d’s Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Gazette (Williamsburg: William R<strong>in</strong>d, May 16, 1766), 1. <strong>The</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al is at<br />

the New York Historical Society; see Clarence Brigham, History and Bibliography <strong>of</strong> American<br />

Newspapers, 1690-1820 (Worcester: American Antiquarian Society, 1947), 2:1160-1163.<br />

48 Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Gazette (Williamsburg: Alexander Purdie, March 28, 1766), 3.<br />

49 “Philanthropos,” and “A Man <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,” Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Gazette (Purdie & Dixon, Aug. 22,<br />

1766), 1 and 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!