10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

omitted to publish them; others not so timid, but doubtful <strong>of</strong> the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g newspapers without stamps, omitted the<br />

titles, or altered them as an evasion. 17<br />

167<br />

Thomas suggested that opposition to the tax was not universal, but rather ranged<br />

from opposition to neutrality, with no American pr<strong>in</strong>ters actually support<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

act, but some rather weak <strong>in</strong> their opposition. In New Hampshire, Thomas reports,<br />

some patriots thought the one press there was under the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> crown <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

and brought <strong>in</strong> a second pr<strong>in</strong>ter just before the Stamp Act. 18<br />

Other historians have posited that the Stamp Act’s impact on pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

material generated a universal opposition to it from colonial pr<strong>in</strong>ters. Historians<br />

have also seen a greater <strong>in</strong>fluence on the colonial population from the pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

opposition thus generated and dissem<strong>in</strong>ated. Us<strong>in</strong>g Thomas as a major source,<br />

Arthur Schles<strong>in</strong>ger wrote a groundbreak<strong>in</strong>g study regard<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ters dur<strong>in</strong>g the American Revolution and how the Stamp Act actually unified<br />

their support for the patriot cause. His analysis suggested not only the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> American newspapers <strong>in</strong> rally<strong>in</strong>g opposition to new British taxes, but argued that<br />

the Stamp Act changed the actual role <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ters <strong>in</strong> colonial American. This<br />

transformed them, he argued, from merely transmitters <strong>of</strong> ideas to actual makers <strong>of</strong><br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> Stamp Act was an unprecedented <strong>in</strong>ternal tax and “as though<br />

deliberately to provoke resistance, it saddled them [the taxes] largely on the pr<strong>in</strong>ters,<br />

lawyers and merchants who, along with the clergy, formed the most literate and<br />

vocal elements <strong>of</strong> the population.” He claimed that newspaper opposition was<br />

unanimous, “throughout the colonies the pr<strong>in</strong>ters <strong>in</strong> one manner or another defied<br />

the Stamp Act.” Schles<strong>in</strong>ger quotes David Ramsay’s 1789 work, <strong>The</strong> History <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Revolution, <strong>in</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g that pr<strong>in</strong>ters generally favored liberty but were more<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its. He claimed they universally opposed this tax: “A stamp duty,<br />

17 Thomas, History <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> America, 16-17.<br />

18 Ibid., 332.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!