10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

presses. In the 1600s, K<strong>in</strong>g James developed the idea <strong>of</strong> seditious libel, expand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the ancient law <strong>of</strong> Scandalum Magnatum, which outlawed discussion about the k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or government. James and his son K<strong>in</strong>g Charles expanded the prosecution <strong>of</strong><br />

political dissenters by us<strong>in</strong>g this medieval law. In a Star Chamber case <strong>in</strong> 1606,<br />

James eradicated the possibility <strong>of</strong> truth as a defense and made any pr<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> such<br />

sedition liable <strong>in</strong> addition to the author. 21 In alliance with the k<strong>in</strong>g, and later with<br />

Parliament, the stationers kept pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g located only <strong>in</strong> London, under the watchful<br />

eye <strong>of</strong> the government. <strong>The</strong>re were no newspapers <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. Parliament<br />

passed an <strong>of</strong>ficial Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Act (or Licens<strong>in</strong>g Act) <strong>in</strong> 1662 to place <strong>in</strong>to written law<br />

what had already been the practice. Pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter needed a license, and pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

took place only <strong>in</strong> London. 22 Such heavy restrictions on pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g were becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

much too bulky and commercial <strong>in</strong>terests required less burden if they were to<br />

compete with freer presses on the European cont<strong>in</strong>ent. <strong>The</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Act was<br />

allowed to expire by 1695, but that was not a clear move toward freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

press. 23 <strong>The</strong>re was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial presses and newspapers<br />

throughout England after 1695, but convictions for seditious libel and breach <strong>of</strong><br />

privilege cont<strong>in</strong>ued the tradition <strong>of</strong> government control. Punishment after the<br />

fact—and the chill<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> such punishment—replaced the<br />

prior restra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> censorship and licens<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, the government <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

subsidized newspapers, <strong>in</strong>dividual journalists, and even bought <strong>of</strong>f critics <strong>in</strong> efforts<br />

21 Copeland, Idea <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Press</strong>, 38.<br />

22 Harold Innis, Empire and Communications (Toronto: University <strong>of</strong> Toronto <strong>Press</strong>, 1972),<br />

150.<br />

23 English press controls contrasted with France where censorship <strong>of</strong>ten meant read<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

specific item before it could be pr<strong>in</strong>ted. See Henry L. Snyder, “Newsletters <strong>in</strong> England, 1689-<br />

1715: With Special Reference to John Dyer—A Byway <strong>in</strong> the History <strong>of</strong> England,” <strong>in</strong> Bond,<br />

Newsletters to Newspapers, 3-19, Hannah Barker, <strong>in</strong> Newspapers, Politics and English Society, 1695-<br />

1855 (Harlow, England: Longman, 2000), 1-4, and Jack Censer, <strong>The</strong> French <strong>Press</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Age <strong>of</strong><br />

Enlightenment (London: Routledge, 1994.) However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Copeland, Idea <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Press</strong>,<br />

48-49 and 60-69, both religious <strong>of</strong>ficials and government-appo<strong>in</strong>ted censors read and actively<br />

censored material at various times <strong>in</strong> seventeenth-century England.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!