The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing
The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing
The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
presses. In the 1600s, K<strong>in</strong>g James developed the idea <strong>of</strong> seditious libel, expand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the ancient law <strong>of</strong> Scandalum Magnatum, which outlawed discussion about the k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
or government. James and his son K<strong>in</strong>g Charles expanded the prosecution <strong>of</strong><br />
political dissenters by us<strong>in</strong>g this medieval law. In a Star Chamber case <strong>in</strong> 1606,<br />
James eradicated the possibility <strong>of</strong> truth as a defense and made any pr<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> such<br />
sedition liable <strong>in</strong> addition to the author. 21 In alliance with the k<strong>in</strong>g, and later with<br />
Parliament, the stationers kept pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g located only <strong>in</strong> London, under the watchful<br />
eye <strong>of</strong> the government. <strong>The</strong>re were no newspapers <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces. Parliament<br />
passed an <strong>of</strong>ficial Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Act (or Licens<strong>in</strong>g Act) <strong>in</strong> 1662 to place <strong>in</strong>to written law<br />
what had already been the practice. Pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter needed a license, and pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
took place only <strong>in</strong> London. 22 Such heavy restrictions on pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g were becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />
much too bulky and commercial <strong>in</strong>terests required less burden if they were to<br />
compete with freer presses on the European cont<strong>in</strong>ent. <strong>The</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Act was<br />
allowed to expire by 1695, but that was not a clear move toward freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
press. 23 <strong>The</strong>re was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial presses and newspapers<br />
throughout England after 1695, but convictions for seditious libel and breach <strong>of</strong><br />
privilege cont<strong>in</strong>ued the tradition <strong>of</strong> government control. Punishment after the<br />
fact—and the chill<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> such punishment—replaced the<br />
prior restra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> censorship and licens<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, the government <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
subsidized newspapers, <strong>in</strong>dividual journalists, and even bought <strong>of</strong>f critics <strong>in</strong> efforts<br />
21 Copeland, Idea <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Press</strong>, 38.<br />
22 Harold Innis, Empire and Communications (Toronto: University <strong>of</strong> Toronto <strong>Press</strong>, 1972),<br />
150.<br />
23 English press controls contrasted with France where censorship <strong>of</strong>ten meant read<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
specific item before it could be pr<strong>in</strong>ted. See Henry L. Snyder, “Newsletters <strong>in</strong> England, 1689-<br />
1715: With Special Reference to John Dyer—A Byway <strong>in</strong> the History <strong>of</strong> England,” <strong>in</strong> Bond,<br />
Newsletters to Newspapers, 3-19, Hannah Barker, <strong>in</strong> Newspapers, Politics and English Society, 1695-<br />
1855 (Harlow, England: Longman, 2000), 1-4, and Jack Censer, <strong>The</strong> French <strong>Press</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Age <strong>of</strong><br />
Enlightenment (London: Routledge, 1994.) However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Copeland, Idea <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Press</strong>,<br />
48-49 and 60-69, both religious <strong>of</strong>ficials and government-appo<strong>in</strong>ted censors read and actively<br />
censored material at various times <strong>in</strong> seventeenth-century England.<br />
21