10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While media ecologists look at Habermas as someone who fits with<strong>in</strong> their<br />

category, some do question the translation <strong>of</strong> his most famous work, <strong>The</strong> Structural<br />

Transformation <strong>of</strong> the Public Sphere: An Inquiry <strong>in</strong>to a Category <strong>of</strong> Bourgeois Society.<br />

<strong>The</strong> phrase, “Bürgerliche Öffentlichkeit,” was rendered <strong>in</strong>to English as “bourgeois<br />

public sphere,” but it has been argued that he meant neither a sphere nor bourgeois.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first term, “Bürgerliche,” has a larger context <strong>in</strong> German than simply<br />

“bourgeois,” as “civil” or “citizen.” <strong>The</strong> second term, “Öffentlichkeit,” more literally<br />

means “publicness.” Bourgeois, or middle class, is not a good term for the colonies<br />

where such an economic class was not fully formed. For media ecologists who view<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t and the thought it engenders as l<strong>in</strong>ear, the description <strong>of</strong> a spherical space is<br />

antithetical. Of some importance here is the view that, “literate and pr<strong>in</strong>t culture<br />

favors the l<strong>in</strong>ear, detached, abstract, rational, and <strong>in</strong>dividual, while pr<strong>in</strong>t culture, by<br />

extension, encourages <strong>in</strong>dividualism, nationalism, and democracy.” 120 <strong>The</strong> term,<br />

“Civic Publicness,” may be a more apt translation, although a bit awkward, and<br />

“civic public,” or “civil society” are the most usable translations. While deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> a civic public engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such discourse, this study will largely avoid<br />

the term, “public sphere,” us<strong>in</strong>g rather the idea <strong>of</strong> an expand<strong>in</strong>g public engagrd <strong>in</strong><br />

civic discourse.<br />

Return<strong>in</strong>g to Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, then, what can be observed here is that the small<br />

number <strong>of</strong> elite leaders who once monopolized such discourse was beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to give<br />

way by 1760 to a larger, more literate population who read about political disputes<br />

such as the Parson’s Cause and could <strong>in</strong>fluence an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important public<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion. 121 Such participation <strong>in</strong> civic discourse, which was formerly was above their<br />

station, naturally contributed to a weaken<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> deference. This civic public, rather<br />

than Habermas’s “bourgeois public sphere,” is seen <strong>in</strong> the British-American colonies<br />

as a “republic <strong>of</strong> letters,” a more middl<strong>in</strong>g cultural space, with room for both elite<br />

120 Paul Grosswiler, “Jürgen Habermas: Media Ecologist?,” 22-31.<br />

121 Landsman, Colonials to Prov<strong>in</strong>cials, 30-37.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!