10.01.2013 Views

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary ... - Web Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250<br />

colonial legislature <strong>in</strong> 1770, he spent several months <strong>in</strong> jail for seditious libel, and<br />

became the local darl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> American libertarians. Popular op<strong>in</strong>ion tied his case to<br />

similar governmental action aga<strong>in</strong>st Wilkes <strong>in</strong> England. He was released only when<br />

the legislative session was ended. 75 Wilkes’ fight for liberty were closely l<strong>in</strong>ked—<strong>in</strong><br />

the colonists’ m<strong>in</strong>ds—with their own struggles. <strong>The</strong>y viewed the British m<strong>in</strong>istry’s<br />

efforts to stifle Wilkes the politician and Wilkes the publisher as an example <strong>of</strong> a<br />

corrupt m<strong>in</strong>istry’s threat to liberty, similar to the threats to their own liberties,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g their freedom <strong>of</strong> the press. Wilkes’ travails supplied a very real and<br />

pragmatic example <strong>of</strong> why a free press needed to be shielded from a potentially<br />

corrupt government.<br />

<strong>The</strong> British newspapers also had some visible changes prior to the American<br />

Revolution. <strong>The</strong> political writ<strong>in</strong>g and the concept <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> the press seen on<br />

the pages underwent a transformation follow<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>g George III’s ascension to the<br />

throne <strong>in</strong> 1760. As politics became more radical and reform-oriented, the<br />

newspapers became more critical and public op<strong>in</strong>ion became more important.<br />

Political journalism became harsher, historian Eckhart Hellmuth noted, as writers<br />

blurred the l<strong>in</strong>e between the public and private spheres. Private lives <strong>of</strong> those <strong>in</strong><br />

power were now a fair target for criticism. Social groups beyond the elites were also<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>in</strong> political discourse, and a popular political culture was form<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Hellmuth saw Wilkes and the controversies surround<strong>in</strong>g him as an essential<br />

stimulation <strong>of</strong> this popular criticism. Hellmuth tied a shift<strong>in</strong>g concept <strong>of</strong> press<br />

liberty <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> with this broaden<strong>in</strong>g political sphere and press freedom developed<br />

beyond Cato’s ideal <strong>in</strong> this period. Intr<strong>in</strong>sic to this development was the evolv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> the sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the people, with Parliament viewed as simply their<br />

representatives. <strong>The</strong> press was seen as deriv<strong>in</strong>g their authority to criticize<br />

government from that sovereignty. Such a medium was part <strong>of</strong> the crucial balance<br />

75 Maier, “John Wilkes,” 385-386. See also Levy, Emergence, 80-82.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!