28.01.2013 Views

Olga Rudge & Ezra Pound: "What Thou Lovest Well..."

Olga Rudge & Ezra Pound: "What Thou Lovest Well..."

Olga Rudge & Ezra Pound: "What Thou Lovest Well..."

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 A Marriage That Didn’t Happen<br />

not exactly habitable.’’ If Dorothy’s aim had been to put more miles<br />

between <strong>Olga</strong> and her husband, she was too late. <strong>Olga</strong> had conceived a<br />

child by him.<br />

In the twilight of her life, <strong>Olga</strong> confided in her notebook: ‘‘OR, as early<br />

as 1923, said she would like a child by EP. I would not have made the<br />

suggestion except that after ten years of marriage, his wife did not want a<br />

child, had never wanted a child, and at her age [forty] it did not seem likely<br />

that she would have one.’’<br />

H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), the friend from <strong>Ezra</strong>’s youth who visited the<br />

<strong>Pound</strong>s in London, said of his marriage: ‘‘Yes, Ez is ‘married,’ but there<br />

seems to be a pretty general consensus of opinion that Mrs. E. has not been<br />

‘awakened.’ . . . She is very English and ‘cold’ . . . she loathes (she says)<br />

children!’’ Even if one allows for the bias of <strong>Ezra</strong>’s former sweetheart, her<br />

words have the ring of truth.<br />

In <strong>Olga</strong>’s view, <strong>Ezra</strong> should not be deprived of the privilege of having a<br />

child, a torchbearer. They had a daughter ‘‘by mutual consent,’’ <strong>Olga</strong><br />

wrote, ‘‘but it was I who wanted the child, and saw no reason to make him<br />

responsible. . . . EP could not have undertaken the child’s upbringing, and<br />

OR was not counting on it.’’ When she first mentioned the subject, <strong>Ezra</strong><br />

had turned down the suggestion: the world was no place to bring a child<br />

into, he said, especially without economic security.<br />

In studying the New Freewoman, <strong>Ezra</strong> had drawn the distinction between<br />

the woman who wanted a child for the experience (with indifference<br />

about the sire of said child), and the woman who wanted a child by<br />

a particular man—that is, his child. <strong>Olga</strong> was obviously one of the latter.<br />

But she did not mention the subject again until an unidentified patron of<br />

the arts, a friend of both, suggested to <strong>Ezra</strong> that she would supervise the<br />

upbringing of <strong>Olga</strong>’s child and support it financially. With this commitment,<br />

<strong>Ezra</strong> changed his mind and asked <strong>Olga</strong> if she might change hers.<br />

<strong>Thou</strong>gh <strong>Olga</strong> held the mutual friend in high regard, she ‘‘did not<br />

consider the milieu of the art patron [Natalie Barney?] suitable.’’ With the<br />

allowance from her father supplemented by subletting her mother’s Paris<br />

apartment at a higher rent, she was prepared to assume full responsibility<br />

for the child. <strong>What</strong>ever the complex motives, she recorded some fifty

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!